Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Aisole v. Dean, 574 So. 2d 1248.

75 citing documents.

Broussard v. Romero 691 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Barsayage v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 686 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Barsavage v. STATE DOTD 686 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Blackman v. Eggerton 684 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Perritt v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 673 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Rowe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 670 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Manzella v. Doe 664 So. 2d 398 La. 1996
Dowden v. Mid State Sand & Gravel Co. 664 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
the court stated: To obtain an award for future loss of wages and/or loss of earning capacity, a plaintiff must present medical evidence which indicates with reasonable certainty that there exists a residual disability causally related to the accident.
Holland v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 658 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
However, the plaintiff has a duty “to make every reasonable effort to mitigate damages.” (La.
Daigle v. US Fidelity and Guar. Ins. Co. 655 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated as follows with regard to future wage loss or loss of earning capacity: To obtain an award for future loss of wages and/or loss of earning capacity, a plaintiff must present medical evidence which indicates with reasonable certainty that there exists a residual disab
Haydel v. Hercules Transport, Inc. 654 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the following with regard to loss of future wages or loss of earning capacity: To obtain an award for future loss of wages and/or loss of earning capacity, a plaintiff must present medical evidence which indicates with reasonable certainty that there exists a residua
Andrus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 650 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
” Moreover, we recognize that “[a]wards for loss of future income are inherently speculative and are intrinsically insusceptible of being calculated with mathematical certainty.
Weston v. Hollis 647 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Appellant cites two recent Louisiana Supreme Court cases that have ruled on LRS 32:861 and LRS 32:1042, (one concurring opinion and three dissents)
Alleman v. Brownie Drilling Co. 647 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Criticized Thomas v. Champagne 638 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
|44th Cir.1990), rev’d in part on other grounds
Orgeron v. Prescott 636 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Blanchard v. Means Industries, Inc. 635 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Quirk v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF LA. ST. UNIV. 629 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
a plaintiff who suffered considerable pain as a result of a temporary back injury was awarded $55,000 in general damages.
Quirk v. Board of Supervisors 629 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
a plaintiff who suffered considerable pain as a result of a temporary back injury was awarded $55,000 in general damages.
Bowers v. Viator 625 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Coffin v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. Univ. 620 So. 2d 1354 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the relationship between the responsibility of a tortfeasor and a : It is a well-established principle of law that a tortfeasor takes his victim as he finds him and although the damages caused are greater because of the victims' prior condition which is aggravated by the tort, the tortfeasor is nevertheless responsible for the consequences of his tort.
Bordelon v. SOUTH CENT. BELL TELEPHONE CO. 617 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Bergeron v. Southeastern Louisiana University 610 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed such an issue but nonetheless decided to allow the damage award to stand in that case.
Bacle v. Wade 607 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Bacle v. Wade 607 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992