Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Doughty v. Insured Lloyds Ins. Co., 576 So. 2d 461.

62 citing documents.

Soileau v. Southern Pacific RR 640 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Faul v. Bank of Sunset & Trust Co. 635 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Guillory v. Foster 634 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Franklin v. Ford Motor Corp. 617 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Thumfart v. Lombard 613 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Crane v. Exxon Corp., USA 613 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Co., the supreme court held that ownership is not necessarily equal to garde.
Guillaume v. Guillaume 613 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Co., supports her position.
Bertini v. Turncliff 607 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Smith v. State Through Dept. of Public Safety 620 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Followed Spott v. Otis Elevator Co. 601 So. 2d 1355 La. 1992
Co., which held the owner's presumed garde may be rebutted.
Rivet v. LeBlanc 600 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Socorro v. City of New Orleans 579 So. 2d 931 La. 1991
Co., that although ownership creates the presumption of garde, that presumption is rebuttable by the owner's proving that he had no actual control over the thing.