DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dycus v. MARTIN MARIETTA, 571 So. 2d 649.

22 citing documents.

  • Raywood Joseph Broussard v. Terry Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4 Cir.1990), writ denied, (citing Jacobsen v. Se.
  • Broussard v. Smith 999 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4 Cir.1990), writ denied, (citing Jacobsen v. Se.
  • Hirst v. Thieneman 905 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    4 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • Hirst v. Thieneman 901 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    4 Cir.),writ denied, (La.
  • Cole v. Department of Public Safety 825 So. 2d 1134 La. 2002
    4 Cir.), writ denied, (allowing worker to operate dangerous equipment); Holliday v. B.E.
  • Livaccari v. Alden Engineering, Inc. 808 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.), writ denied, (1990), relied on by the court of appeal below, neither the Act *389 nor the jurisprudence of this court compels the conclusion that the "intentional act" exclusion "applies only to acts which can be classified as traditional intentional torts—such as battery, assault, false imprisonment, etc." In the present case, ac
  • DeBlanc v. International Marine Carriers 748 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir.1990), writ denied, Gray v. McInnis Bros. Const., Inc., (La.App.
  • Reeves v. Structural Preservation Systems 731 So. 2d 208 La. 1999
    4 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • Micele v. CPC of Louisiana, Inc. 709 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • Gaspard v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 688 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4th Cir.1990), writ denied
  • Bridges v. Carl E. Woodward, Inc. 663 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    4th Cir.), writ denied, we observed that "[e]ven proof that a worker was told by his employer to work in an unsafe place was considered insufficient to prove an intentional tort."
  • Landry v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc. 653 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Leger v. Hardy Rice Drier, Inc. 640 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    App. 4 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • Weber v. State 635 So. 2d 188 La. 1994
    4th Cir.), writ denied, (1990), relied on by the court of appeal below, neither the Act nor the jurisprudence of this court compels the conclusion that the "intentional act" exclusion "applies only to acts which can be classified as traditional intentional torts—such as battery, assault, false imprisonment, etc." In the present case, accepti
  • Armstead v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc. 618 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    App. 4th Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.App.
  • Adams v. Time Saver Stores, Inc. 615 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    4 Cir.1990), writ denied
  • Weber v. State 608 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    4th Cir. 1990), writ den., citing Caudle, supra, for the proposition that: ...
  • Brown v. Diversified Hospitality Group, Inc. 600 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    4th Cir. 1990), writ den.
  • Pickney v. Smith 597 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    4 Cir.1990), writ denied, the court states, “The Louisiana Supreme Court has kept the “substantial certainty” test within strict bounds by requiring plaintiffs to allege a specific intentional tort.” The Dycus court further states: “Although the court has not abandoned the Bazley “substantially certain” test, Caudle indicates that t
  • Tapia v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets 590 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    App. 4th Cir.1990), writ denied [1] was also denied.
  • Williams v. Honea 573 So. 2d 1111 La. 1991
    In re Lynette Ann Williams, applying for reconsideration of writ denied December 14, 1990, from the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW90 0899; Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 321-585,19th Judicial District Court.
  • Williams v. Gervais F. Favrot Co., Inc. 573 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    App. 4th Cir.1990), writ denied .