Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Housley v. Cerise, 579 So. 2d 973.

620 citing documents.

Morrison v. Morrison 699 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Centanni v. Spizer 699 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
which deals with proof of causation when a plaintiff is asymptomatic prior to an accident but then develops symptoms immediately after the accident, is not applicable in this case because, as will be discussed below, Mr. Centanni had symptoms prior to the accident.
Barry v. Plaquemine Towing Corp. 698 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Housely [Housley] v. Cerise
Moore v. Popeye's Fried Chicken 697 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Ramos v. Ramos 697 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Warner v. City of New Orleans 694 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Cases such as Dabog, require a seamless sequence of events before the presumption of causation will apply.
Dauzat v. Canal Ins. Co. 692 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Marie v. John Deere Ins. Co. 691 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Sistler, 558 So.2d at 1112 .
Verdin v. LOUISIANA LAND AND EXPLOR. 693 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Johnson v. Lake Charles Memorial Hosp. 692 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Smith, 523 So.2d at 822 ; Hastings, 498 So.2d at 720 ....
Picou v. Equifax Services, Inc. 690 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Whiteman v. Worley 688 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Prestenback v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 688 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Maldonado v. Louisiana Superdome Com'n 687 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Hollingsworth v. Bowers 690 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Smith, 523 So.2d at 822 ; Hastings, 498 So.2d at 720 ....
Terral v. Waffle House, Inc. 684 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Olivier v. LeJeune 686 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The plaintiff is aided in its proof Rburden by a as follows: A claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before-the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, providing that the medical ev
Collins v. McElveen 682 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Mertens v. Mertens 688 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Roux v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 680 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Sistler, 558 So.2d at 1112 .
Shahine v. State Univ. Med. Center 680 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Smith, 523 So.2d at 822 ; Hastings, 498 So.2d at 720 ."
Cox v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 680 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Smith, 523 So.2d at 822 ; Hastings, 498 So.2d at 720 ."
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Batiste 676 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Turner v. Cleveland Trust Co. 686 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Jones v. Peyton Place, Inc. 675 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Kimble v. East Baton Rouge Parish 673 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Fletcher v. Fenoli 674 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Callihan v. Town of Vinton 668 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Jack v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 671 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Rowe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 670 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Gordon v. Louisiana State University Board of Supervisors 669 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
for the proposition that this presumption applies if, before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, providing that the medical evidence shows there to be a reasonable
Gordon v. LSU BD. OF SUP'RS 669 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Morris v. Ferriss 669 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Smith, 523 So.2d at 822 ; Hastings, 498 So.2d at 720 .
Regan v. Gore 670 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc. 666 So. 2d 1073 La. 1996
Manuel v. Shell Oil Co. 664 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Deason v. Allstate Insurance 669 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Sistler, 558 So.2d at 1112 .
Franatovich v. Deep South Trucking, Inc. 665 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Singleton v. Ross 664 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Oxley v. Sabine River Authority 663 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Nonetheless, this Court has emphasized that "the reviewing court must always keep in mind that `if the trial court or jury's findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.'" (quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Ragas v. Dewey 663 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Smith, 523 So.2d at 822 ; Hastings, 498 So.2d at 720 .
Johnson v. State 671 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
The district court erred as a
Olivier v. Allstate Ins. Co. 663 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Pattan v. Fields 669 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
The Louisiana Supreme Court has emphasized that "the reviewing court must always keep in mind that `if the trial court or jury's findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.'"
Donaldson v. Sanders 661 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Kilpatrick v. Alliance Cas. & Reinsurance Co. 663 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Tartar v. Hymes 656 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
A on rehearing: A claimant's disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, providing that the medical eviden
Lewis v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION & DEV. 654 So. 2d 311 La. 1995
Gage v. Potts 653 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER TWO In their second assignment of error
Elder v. Rowe 653 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
See Spiegal, 94-1252, at p. 4, 650 So.2d at 745 ; Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Co., 93-1182 (La.App.