Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Housley v. Cerise, 579 So. 2d 973.

620 citing documents.

Guidry v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc. 191 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Bernard v. Hartford Insurance Co., 09-71 (La.App.
McCraine v. Voyellesland Farms, Inc. 177 So. 3d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
James Nicholas Arterburn v. Karen Ann Powers Arterburn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Arterburn v. Arterburn 176 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State, Board of Ethics v. Garriga 182 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State Board of Ethics v. Arnold 184 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Zimmerman v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 174 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
| lsRaymo argues Zimmerman provided no professional medical testimony to prove causation and therefore
Richardson v. Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Co. 181 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Tyron Reed v. Dondi Lacombe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
“Whether an accident caused a person’s injuries is a question of fact which should not be reversed on appeal absent manifest error.” ().
Cynthia Bridges, SEC. Dept. of Rev., State of Louisiana v. Nelson Industrial Steam Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Bridges v. Nelson Industrial Steam Co. 169 So. 3d 711 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Fairfield Pentecostal Church v. Elwood Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Fairfield Pentecostal Church v. Johnson 170 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Whitlock v. Fifth Louisiana District Levee Board 164 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Stevenson v. Serth 169 So. 3d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
McKamey v. Carona 169 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Jones v. American Reliable Insurance Co. 163 So. 3d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Gene Bordelon, Jr. v. Cutting Edge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
“[The causation] of a person’s injuries is a question of fact which should not be reversed on appeal absent manifest error.”
Nolan C. Barras, Jr., Et Ux. v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Barras v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 157 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Joiner v. American Casualty Co. 162 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Housley v. Cerise, 90-2304 (La.5/6/01), .
Wayne Guillot, Et Ux. v. Reece Guillot, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Guillot v. Guillot 161 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Romero-Zambrano v. Bell 165 So. 3d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Williams v. Mathieu 155 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
[4Plaintiff is assisted in hér wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that: [a] claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwar
Lawrence v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 151 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Bass, Ltd. v. City of New Iberia La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
at 882- 83 ( (quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mut.
Tamayo v. American National General Insurance Co. 150 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Louisiana Board of Ethics v. Ralph Wilson and Hon. Louie Bernard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Louisiana Board of Ethics v. Wilson 161 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Clyde Snider, Jr. v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Snider v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 146 So. 3d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Smith, 523 So.2d at 822 ; Hastings, 498 So.2d at 720 .
Cormier v. Cushenberry 147 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Housley presumption, is that a plaintiff’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, provided that the medical evidence sh
Clement v. Carbon 153 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Frost v. Carter 140 So. 3d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Reddoch v. Parish of Plaquemines 134 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Bloxham v. Jeffrey V. Anzalone, D.D.S., L.L.C. 134 So. 3d 1216 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Ricky Fontenot v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Danielle Brooke Thibodeaux v. Ace American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
(), the supreme court determined: [a] claimant‟s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident
Thibodeaux v. Ace American Insurance Co. 127 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
(quoting Lucas v. Insurance Co. of North, America, (La.
Guillot v. Dolgencorp, L.L.C. 127 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“Whether an accident caused a person’s injuries is a question of fact which should not be reversed on appeal absent manifest error.”
Timothy Cormier v. McNeese State University La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Josie E. Sabbides v. Mark S. Sabbides La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
In addition, (), specifically clarified the role of the appellate court by stating, “if the trial court or jury’s findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even though conv
Marilyn Mosley Haggerty v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
rial court is manifestly erroneous in its calculation of the award to the plaintiff and [the award] constitutes an abuse of discretion.” ANALYSIS The law is well established the determination of “[w]hether an accident caused a person’s injuries is a question of fact which should not be reversed on appeal absent manifest error.” ().
Mosley-Haggerty v. Allstate Insurance Co. 115 So. 3d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Plaintiff has appealed, contending “the trial court is manifestly erroneous in its calculation of the award to the plaintiff and [the award] constitutes an abuse of discretion.” ANALYSIS The law is well established the determination of “[w]hether an accident caused a person’s injuries is a question of fact which should not be reversed on appeal absent manifest error.” ().
James Patrick Patin v. Leo William Ferguson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Patin v. Ferguson 115 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Melissa Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
“Whether an accident caused a person’s injuries is a question of fact which should not be reversed on appeal absent manifest error.” ().
Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USA 117 So. 3d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“Whether an accident caused a person’s injuries is a question of fact which should not be reversed on appeal absent manifest error.” ().
Royal Oldsmobile Co. v. Heisler Properties, L.L.C. 119 So. 3d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
[Housley v. Cerise, et al., ]