Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Housley v. Cerise, 579 So. 2d 973.

620 citing documents.

Edward Trent, Jr. v. Ppg Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The plaintiffs, therefore, argue that the trial court erred in granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment “simply because the plaintiffs could not pinpoint the exact chemical to which they had been exposed.” in support of their argument.
Edward Trent, Jr. v. Ppg Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The plaintiffs, therefore, argue that the trial court erred in granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment “simply because the plaintiffs could not pinpoint the exact chemical to which they had been exposed.” in support of their argument.
Edward Trent, Jr. v. Ppg Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The plaintiffs, therefore, argue that the trial court erred in granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment “simply because the plaintiffs could not pinpoint the exact chemical to which they had been exposed.” in support of their argument.
Trent v. PPG Industries, Inc. 930 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Tracy Lynne Hebert v. Lafayette Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Nonetheless, this Court has emphasized that “the reviewing court must always keep in mind that ‘if the trial court or jury’s findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.’” (La.
Hebert v. LAFAYETTE CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT 930 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Nonetheless, this Court has emphasized that "the reviewing court must always keep in mind that `if the trial court or jury's findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.'" (La.
Delano Plantation v. June Amy Lowrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Teresa Allen v. Glenn Edward Belgard, Et Ux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Delano Plantation v. Lowrey 926 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Allen v. Belgard 925 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Brown v. Jones 929 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 922 So. 2d 1113 La. 2006
at 882-83 () (quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
M & L Industries, LLC v. Derek Hailey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
M & L INDUSTRIES, LLC v. Hailey 923 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Rapides Parish Police Jury v. Grant Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Rapides Parish Police Jury v. Grant Parish Police Jury 924 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Siverd v. Permanent General Ins. Co. 922 So. 2d 497 La. 2006
Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882 -83 ( (La.
Shaunn Caillier McCorvey v. Derriel Carlton McCorvey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Additionally, a reviewing court must keep in mind that if a trial court’s findings are reasonable based upon the entire record and evidence, an appellate court may not reverse said findings even if it is “convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed that evidence differently.”
McCorvey v. McCorvey 922 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Williams v. Cooper 926 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Jaramillo v. Lopez 925 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
The plaintiff may be assisted in meeting the burden of proof required to establish that an injury was caused by an accident by a
Landry v. Furniture Center 920 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In claimant's brief, he relies on the Housely presumption
Dalton Landry v. Furniture Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In claimant’s brief, he relies on the Housely presumption
James E. Viviano, Et Ux. v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Viviano v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 920 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Long v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 916 So. 2d 87 La. 2005
at 882-83 () (quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Peters v. Williams 917 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
: A claimant's disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident if, before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, providing that the medical evidence shows
Lafayette City Parish v. Dien's Auto 916 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Lafayette City Parish Consolidated Government v. Dien's Auto Salvage, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Shaunn Caillier McCorvey v. Derriel Carlton McCorvey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
McCorvey v. McCorvey 916 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Orleans Sheet Metal Works & Roofing, Inc. v. Rabito 916 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Janis Square v. Marjorie Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
and Brown v. Trinity Universal Ins.
Square v. LeBlanc 903 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
and Brown v. Trinity Universal Ins.
Tracie Bernard v. Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Dutton v. O'Connell 901 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
This Court has noted that “the reviewing court must always keep in mind that ‘if the trial court or jury’s findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.’” Stobart, citing
Michelle Detraz v. Victor Lee D/B/A Virgin Nails La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
in which the court determined: 6 A claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the
Detraz v. Lee 900 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
in which the court determined: A claimant's disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, providing that
Lam Ex Rel. Lam v. State Farm Auto. Ins. 901 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Heather Reider v. Louisiana Board of Trustees for State Colleges La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Nonetheless, this Court has emphasized that “the reviewing court must always keep in mind that ‘if the trial court or jury’s findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.’” (La.
Sullivan v. Franicevich 899 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Reider v. State Ex Rel. La. Bd. of Trustees 897 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Nonetheless, this Court has emphasized that "the reviewing court must always keep in mind that `if the trial court or jury's findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.'" ( quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Carlos v. CNA Ins. Co. 900 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
and in failing to find that the deposition exhibits attached to the motion for summary judgment and the opposition thereto presented a genuine issue of material fact regarding causation.
Desselle v. Jefferson Hosp. Dist. No. 2 887 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Farrell , 02-1136 at 8, 846 So.2d at 54 , citing Calcagno , 01-691 at 11, 802 So.2d at 746, 752 ; Dabog, 625 So.2d at 494
Shreveport Electric Co. v. OASIS POOL SERVICE 889 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
McElveen v. City of New Orleans 888 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
(quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Gilliam v. Palazzo 881 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Smith, 523 So.2d at 822 ; Hastings, 498 So.2d at 720 .
Bush v. XYZ Ins. Co. 880 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
(quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Keller v. Cohen 879 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Martin v. Performance Motorwerks, Inc. 879 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Further, “where two permissible views of the evidence exist, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.” Stobart, supra; Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by