Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Henson v. Safeco Ins. Companies, 585 So. 2d 534.

95 citing documents.

Williams v. Patterson Insurance Co. 700 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Anderson v. Allstate Ins. Co. 699 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Daigle, supra ; Nesbitt, supra .
Riser v. Brown 699 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Daigle v. Authement, 96-1662 (La.4/8/97), , citing
New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Gowen 699 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Nesbitt v. Progressive Ins. Co. 697 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Stephenson v. Van Vleit 693 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Cos., wherein the supreme court held that merely signing a general application for insurance did not indicate a specific intent to reject UM coverage.
Daigle v. Authement 691 So. 2d 1213 La. 1997
Piper v. Southern United Fire Insurance 692 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Longo v. Bercegeay 692 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Lafitte v. Compton 690 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Moyles v. Cruz 682 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Deville v. Allstate Ins. Co. 688 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Cangelosi v. Allstate Ins. Co. 680 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Haney v. Zurich Ins. Co. 680 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Gordon v. Southern United Fire Ins. Co. 679 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Washington v. Imperial Fire & Cas. Ins. 677 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Pine v. Doolittle 677 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
the UM rejection was held invalid.
Daigle v. Authement 676 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Johnson v. Allstate Ins. Co. 673 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Fontenot v. Henderson 670 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Hobbs v. Rhodes 667 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Co., : "The insurer must place the insured in a position to make an informed rejection."
McCoy v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 664 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Martin v. Champion Ins. Co. 656 So. 2d 991 La. 1995
Tugwell, 609 So.2d at 198
Degruise v. Houma Courier Newspaper Corp. 657 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Nelson v. Ragan 653 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
West v. Louisiana Indem. Co. 653 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Accordingly, is distinguished.
Esponge v. City of New Orleans 650 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Thomas v. Goodson 647 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that where the insurance applicant merely signed a general application for insurance already completed and presented to him by his insurance agent, "without either marking the inconspicuous uninsured motorist coverage rejection box himself or signing or initialing the mark b
Anderson v. Allstate Ins. Co. 642 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
In another case relied on by Mr. Anderson, the court held that "the insurer must place the insured in a position to make an informed rejection of UM coverage."
Holbrook v. Holliday 640 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
which expresses the view that it is a rejection and not an acceptance which requires an affirmative act.
Longman v. Allstate Ins. Co. 635 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Faucheaux v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. 633 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Futch v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 625 So. 2d 1019 La. 1994
Doyle v. Titan Indem. Co. 629 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Companies, our Supreme Court discussed the efficacy of a pre-completed form: The insurer's analysis is faulty because insurers in Louisiana are required to include UM coverage unless specifically rejected by the insured.
Martin v. Clanton 626 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Huguet v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 619 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Dibos v. Bill Watson Ford, Inc. 622 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Allen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 617 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Lantier v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 614 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
App. 1st Cir.1990), writ granted, 572 So.2d *1357 81 (La.1991), reversed on other grounds, (La.App.
Alford v. Woods 614 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Mosley v. Dairyland Ins. Co. 614 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Henson v. Safeco *796 Insurance Companies, (La.
Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co. 609 So. 2d 195 La. 1992
Washington v. Savoie 607 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Young v. Shelter Ins. Co. 604 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Companies, Giroir v. Theriot, supra.
Fontenot v. Champion Ins. Co. 597 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Companies, that in order for a rejection of UM coverage to be valid, "the insurer must place the insured in a position to make an informed rejection of UM coverage."