Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Doe v. Smith, 573 So. 2d 1139.

15 citing documents.

  • Doe v. Breedlove 906 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied
  • Norwood v. Van Veckhoven 792 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    1st Cir. 1990), writ denied, (La.
  • Doe v. Mires 741 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied, a case involving child molestation, found “child molestation is one such rare instance where a factuál determination of negligence or intentional conduct is inappropriate as a practical matter.
  • Doe v. Mires 741 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied, a case involving child molestation, found "child molestation is one such rare instance where a factual determination of negligence or intentional conduct is inappropriate as a practical matter.
  • Distinguished L.M. v. J.P.M. 714 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied, : ...
  • Distinguished Lm v. Jpm 714 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied, : ...
  • Stein v. Martin 709 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    1 Cir.1990), writ denied : Generally, the purpose of an intentional injury exclusion is to restrict liability insurance coverage to an insured in circumstances where the insured acts deliberately and intends or expects bodily injury to another.
  • Doe v. Doe 665 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    1st Cir. 1990), writ denied
  • Belsom v. Bravo 658 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    App. 1st Cir.1990), writ denied, a case involving child molestation, found "child molestation is one such rare instance where a factual determination of negligence or intentional conduct is inappropriate as a practical matter.
  • Smith v. Perkins 648 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • Doe v. State, Dept. of Health & Human Resources 623 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied
  • Piraro v. Dupuy 618 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.App.
  • Shaw v. Bourn 615 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    1st 1990), writ denied the court stated: "Generally, the purpose of an intentional injury exclusion is to restrict liability insurance coverage by denying coverage to an insured in circumstances where the insured acts deliberately and intends or expects bodily injury to another.
  • South Louisiana Bank v. Williams 591 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied
  • Wallace v. Cappel 592 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.App.