Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Doe v. Smith, 573 So. 2d 1139.
-
Doe v. Breedlove
906 So. 2d 565
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
1st Cir.1990), writ denied
-
Norwood v. Van Veckhoven
792 So. 2d 836
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
1st Cir. 1990), writ denied, (La.
-
Doe v. Mires
741 So. 2d 842
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1st Cir.1990), writ denied, a case involving child molestation, found “child molestation is one such rare instance where a factuál determination of negligence or intentional conduct is inappropriate as a practical matter.
-
Doe v. Mires
741 So. 2d 842
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
1st Cir.1990), writ denied, a case involving child molestation, found "child molestation is one such rare instance where a factual determination of negligence or intentional conduct is inappropriate as a practical matter.
-
Distinguished
L.M. v. J.P.M.
714 So. 2d 809
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
1st Cir.1990), writ denied, : ...
-
Distinguished
Lm v. Jpm
714 So. 2d 809
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
1st Cir.1990), writ denied, : ...
-
Stein v. Martin
709 So. 2d 1041
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
1 Cir.1990), writ denied : Generally, the purpose of an intentional injury exclusion is to restrict liability insurance coverage to an insured in circumstances where the insured acts deliberately and intends or expects bodily injury to another.
-
Doe v. Doe
665 So. 2d 24
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
1st Cir. 1990), writ denied
-
Belsom v. Bravo
658 So. 2d 1304
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
App. 1st Cir.1990), writ denied, a case involving child molestation, found "child molestation is one such rare instance where a factual determination of negligence or intentional conduct is inappropriate as a practical matter.
- Smith v. Perkins 648 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
-
Doe v. State, Dept. of Health & Human Resources
623 So. 2d 72
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
1st Cir.1990), writ denied
-
Piraro v. Dupuy
618 So. 2d 48
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
1st Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.App.
-
Shaw v. Bourn
615 So. 2d 466
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
1st 1990), writ denied the court stated: "Generally, the purpose of an intentional injury exclusion is to restrict liability insurance coverage by denying coverage to an insured in circumstances where the insured acts deliberately and intends or expects bodily injury to another.
-
South Louisiana Bank v. Williams
591 So. 2d 375
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
1st Cir.1990), writ denied
-
Wallace v. Cappel
592 So. 2d 418
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1st Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.App.