Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roberts v. Murphy Oil Corp., 577 So. 2d 308.
- Ebony Holmes v. City of New Orleans, Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, Hard Rock Construction, LLC, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
- Ronata Llopis v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company (in its capacity as uninsured/underinsured motorist carrier) and USAA … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
- Rondeno v. Law Office of William S. Vincent 111 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
-
Habitat, Inc. v. Commons Condominiums, LLC
97 So. 3d 1126
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 3/24/09), ; (La.App.
- Bentley v. Fanguy 3 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
-
Kroger Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons, Inc.
2 So. 3d 1163
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
597 , (1970); Tilley, supra; *1168 (La.App.
- Elmer v. West Jefferson Levee Dist. 803 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
- Eubanks v. BAYOU D'ARBONNE WATERSHED DIST. 742 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- Estate of Patout v. City of New Iberia 738 So. 2d 544 La. 1999
- Estate of Patout v. City of New Iberia 708 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
-
Chapital v. Guaranty Savings & Homestead Ass'n
681 So. 2d 1307
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
At oral argument counsel speculated that the trial court *1311 dismissed the claims raised in the supplemental petition because that petition was improperly filed after Hodge’s answer without setting a contradictory hearing, (La.App.
-
Sellers v. St. Charles Parish
655 So. 2d 367
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
They further contend that the two year prescriptive period does not apply because it only relates to damages caused by the construction of things for the public purpose, but not for construction based on expropriation or appropriation proceedings, (La.App.
- FARMERS-MERCHANTS BANK v. St. Katherine Ins. 640 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
-
Koenig v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
619 So. 2d 1127
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
"AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL" PETITION NOPSI argues that this Court should not consider Koenig's "amended and supplemental" petition because: (1) it was filed over a year and one-half after the original petition and three days before the hearing on the motion for summary judgment; (2) (La.App.
- Tilley v. Kennedy 605 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- Small v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury 589 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
-
Roberts v. Murphy Oil Corp.
580 So. 2d 670
La. 1991
Prior report: La.App., .
-
Roberts v. Murphy Oil Corp.
580 So. 2d 670
La. 1991
Prior report: La.App., .
-
Roberts v. Murphy Oil Corp.
580 So. 2d 673
La. 1991
Prior report: La.App., .