No. 90-CA-1223 Precedential Processed

Seltzer v. Seltzer

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed July 30, 1991 · 584 So. 2d 710

Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., July 30, 1991 584 So. 2d 710

Cited by

Briscoe v. Briscoe 641 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Goodwin v. Goodwin 618 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Seltzer v. Seltzer 588 So. 2d 1119 La. 1991
Seltzer v. Seltzer 588 So. 2d 1120 La. 1991

Opinion text

SCHOTT, Chief Judge, concurring in the result: This case was essentially a conflict of fact evidence and expert testimony which the trial court resolved in favor of appellee. A reading of the record does not show that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are clearly wrong. Appellant’s argument that her psychiatrist’s testimony was wrongfully excluded has no merit on appeal because she failed to proffer the testimony in accordance with C.C.P. art. 1636.