Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sutton v. Duplessis, 584 So. 2d 362.

27 citing documents.

Matthew Grady and Melicia Grady, individually and as representatives of the minor, Eleanor Grady v. Mia Nicole Ahles, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
App. 3 Cir. 1993); ( La.
Emma Bradford v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
“A proximate cause is generally defined as any cause which, in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient, intervening cause, produces the result complained of and without which the result would not have occurred.” (La.App.
Bradford v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 237 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Sutton v. Duplessis , , 365 (La.App.
Marable v. Empire Truck Sales of Louisiana, LLC 221 So. 3d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
A “proximate cause” is generally defined as “any cause which, in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by an efficient, intervening cause, produces the result complained of without which the result would not have occurred.” (La.
Panfilo Carrillo v. Billy W. David La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
“A proximate cause is generally defined as any cause which, in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient, intervening cause, produces the result complained of and without which the result would not have occurred.” (La.App.
Tangela Annette Brown v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
“A proximate cause is generally defined as any cause which, in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient, intervening cause, produces the result complained of and without which the result would not have occurred.” (La.App.
Anthony v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC. 146 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“A proximate cause is generally defined as any cause which, in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient, intervening cause, produces the result complained of and without which the result would not have occurred.” (La.App.
Tangela Annette Brown v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
“A proximate cause is generally defined as any cause which, in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient, intervening cause, produces the result complained of and without which the result would not have occurred.” (La.App.
Brown v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles, LLC 104 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“A proximate cause is generally defined as any cause which, in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient, intervening cause, produces the result complained of and without which the result would not have occurred.” (La.App.
Christina Hoyt Hutto v. McNeil-ppc, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
“A proximate cause is 17 generally defined as any cause which, in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient, intervening cause, produces the result complained of and without which the result would not have occurred.” (La.App.
Hutto v. McNeil-PPC, Inc. 79 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“A proximate cause is | ]¡¡generally defined as any cause which, in natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by any efficient, intervening cause, produces the result complained of and without which the result would not have occurred.” (La.App.
S.J. v. Lafayette Parish School Board 41 So. 3d 1119 La. 2010
S. J. v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
SJ v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 959 So. 2d 884 La. 2007
Rather, we simply hold, (La.App.
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp. 886 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
We embraced the "intervening" (La.App.
Lane v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance Co. 883 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Domingue v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 879 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Valerie Duhon Domingue v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Musacchia v. Hilton New Orleans Corp. 876 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 1/015/03), rehearing denied 1/15/03; writ denied 9/26/03, (La.App.
Shofstahl v. Board of Commissioners 841 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
|inWe embraced the “intervening” (La.App.
Shofstahl v. BD. OF COM'RS OF ORLEANS LEVEE 841 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
We embraced the "intervening" (La.App.
Jackson v. Colvin 732 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Distinguished Turner v. D'Amico 684 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Dent v. Perkins 629 So. 2d 1354 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Gary on Behalf of Gary v. Meche 626 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
4th Cir.1993), writ denied, (La.App.
Hickingbottom v. Orleans Parish School Board 623 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Scardina v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 597 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992