Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Armstrong v. Lorino, 580 So. 2d 528.

22 citing documents.

Laura Carter v. Iberia Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 1993), and in giving them ‘great discretion’ in deciding which witnesses are qualified as experts, the breadth and scope of expert testimony, and the probative value of expert testimony, (La.App.
Carter v. Iberia Parish Sch. Bd. 258 So. 3d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 1993), and in giving them 'great discretion' in deciding which witnesses are qualified as experts, the breadth and scope of expert testimony, and the probative value of expert testimony, Armstrong v. Lorino , , 531 (La.App.
Haynes v. Calcasieu Medical Transp., Inc. 702 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
App. 2nd Cir.1991); (La.App.
Riser v. Acadiana Limousine Service 693 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
App. 2nd Cir.1991); (La.App.
Coleman v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 688 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Hebert v. Podiatry Ins. Co. of America 688 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
App. 2nd Cir.1991); (La.App.
Cross v. Cutter Biological, Div. of Miles Inc. 676 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
art. 702, comment (d); (La.App.
Conrad v. Doe 665 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Seagers v. Pailet 656 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Bosse v. Westinghouse Elec., Inc. 637 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc. 634 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Smith v. Shell Oil Co. 629 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Having adopted the above standard as our own, (La.App.
Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. 627 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Frederick v. Woman's Hosp. of Acadiana 626 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
3d Cir. 1993), and in giving them "great discretion" in deciding which witnesses are qualified as experts, the breadth and scope of expert testimony, and the probative value of expert testimony, (La.App.
State v. Bancroft 620 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Pereira v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 620 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
article 702 Comment (d); (La.App.
State v. Mays 612 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Art. 702, Comment (d); (La.App.
Smith v. Two" R" Drilling Co., Inc. 606 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Page v. Gilbert 598 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
(4th Cir.App.1991), was confronted with a "crashworthiness" case involving General Motors Corporation.
Verdun v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 598 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Verdun v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 598 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Armstrong v. Lorino 584 So. 2d 1166 La. 1991
Prior report: La.App., .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by