Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hare v. Hodgins, 567 So. 2d 670.
- Wahlborg v. Wahlborg 973 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- Mire v. Mire 962 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
Chad Anthony Mire v. Lacinda Michelle Stewart Mire
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Furthermore, in a holding specifically affirmed by the supreme court, the fifth circuit stated: “[T]he law is clear that where there is no 3 transfer of rights in the partition document, an asset remains owned in indivision by the parties.” (La.App.
- Dean F. Leblanc v. Jenny A. Hulin Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 915 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Day v. Day 858 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Robinson v. Robinson 778 So. 2d 1105 La. 2001
-
Thurston v. Thurston
740 So. 2d 268
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
See Hare v. *271 Hodgins, (La.App.
-
Faucheux v. Faucheux
706 So. 2d 654
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Hare v. Hodgins, *655 (La.App.
- Terrebonne v. Theriot 657 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- Sherrill v. Sherrill 639 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- Hare v. Hodgins 618 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Martinez v. Martinez 602 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Hare v. Hodgins 586 So. 2d 118 La. 1991
-
Hare v. Hodgins
571 So. 2d 638
La. 1990
Prior report: La.App., .
-
Hare v. Hodgins
571 So. 2d 638
La. 1990
Prior report: La.App., .