DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite De Reyes v. Marine Mgt. and Consulting, 586 So. 2d 103.

141 citing documents.

  • Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. 709 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    95 (1945); de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd.
  • Vardaman v. Airosol Co. 703 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • Aetna Cas. & Surety Co. v. Continental Western Ins. Co. 704 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Sunrise Shipping Agency, Inc. v. Universal Maritime Services, Ltd. 700 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    This two-part test applies to the analysis of both specific and general jurisdiction questions, de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd.
  • Davis v. Glen Eagle Ship Mgmt. Corp. 700 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in deReyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd., determined that the two part test used in specific jurisdiction cases should also be applied in general jurisdiction cases.
  • Young v. Bichan Partnership 709 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    In de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd., the Louisiana Supreme Court analyzed jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court regarding long-arm jurisdiction.
  • Cutitto v. Boyes 695 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd.
  • Anderson v. Interamerican Mfg., Inc. 693 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd.
  • Hunter v. Meyers 691 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    deReyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd., (La.
  • Johnson v. B & B Electric Contractors 689 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Additionally, submission of a jurisdictional exception on briefs, affidavits and depositions is permissible in our courts, de Reyes v. Marine Management & Consulting Ltd.
  • Prine v. Prine 687 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    95 (1945); deReyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd., Spillers v. Sierra Testing, Inc., 26,816 (La.App.2d Cir. 04/05/95), , rev. denied, 95-1143 (La.06/16/95), .
  • Coastal Credit Co. v. CSS, Inc. 685 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    In deReyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd., the Supreme Court of Louisiana recognized the distinction between specific and general jur *467 isdiction.
  • American Valve Mfg. Co. v. VIR 685 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    See de Reyes v. Marine Management & Consulting Ltd., (La.
  • Simmons v. Templeton 684 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Lewis v. Industrial Demolishers, Inc. 683 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Traigle v. Imhoff 683 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd.
  • Salley v. COLONIAL MARINE INDUS. 680 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    deReyes v. *1249 Marine Management & Consulting, citing International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 , 66 S.Ct.
  • Gazzier v. Columba Transport Co. 675 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    and Consulting, -09 (La.1991).
  • Explained Escoto v. US Lending Corp. 675 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    deReyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd., (La.
  • Teknika Electronics Corp. v. Satellite Earth Stations of Louisiana, Inc. 673 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    and Consulting, Ltd., see also, Asahi Metal Industry Co., Ltd. v. Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102 , 107 S.Ct.
  • Bodden v. Zapata Gulf Marine Corp. 673 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    The burden then shifts to the party opposing [¿jurisdiction to prove that the assertion of jurisdiction would be so unreasonable in light of traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice as to overcome .the presumption of reasonableness created by the defendant’s minimum contacts with the forum, de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd, (La.
  • Bosarge v. Master Mike, Inc. 669 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Boatwright v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 661 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • Zivalich v. INTERN. BROTH. OF TEAMSTERS 662 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • Higley v. Higley 658 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    This requirement ensures that the defendant will not be haled into a jurisdiction solely as a result of a random, fortuitous, or attenuated contact, or by the unilateral activity of another party or a third person, de Reyes [v. Marine Management and Consulting Ltd.], supra [ ].
  • Jasper v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc. 657 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd., see also International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, Office of Unemployment Compensation and Placement, 326 U.S. 310, 320 , 66 S.Ct.
  • Louisiana Plastic Converting Corp. v. Plexchem International, Inc. 655 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd., Mayo v. Tillman Aero, Inc., supra.
  • Verdin v. Morania Oil Tanker Corp. 655 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    95 (1945); de Reyes v. Marine Management & Consulting
  • Hunt v. Schult Homes Corp. 657 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    deReyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd., quoting language originally enunciated in International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 , 66 S.Ct.
  • Spillers v. Sierra Testing, Inc. 653 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Bordelon v. Burlington Broadcasting, Ltd. 652 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd.
  • Cohen v. Cohen 635 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd.
  • Langley v. Oxford Chemicals, Inc. 634 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    and Consulting, required that it sustain the exception of lack of jurisdiction.
  • Mayo v. Tillman Aero, Inc. 640 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    and Consulting, Ltd., (La.
  • Cadawas v. Skibsaksjeselskapet Storli, Bergin 630 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
    de Reyes v. Marine Management and Consultant, Ltd.
  • Warren v. McNair 622 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Burk v. Gibbens 620 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    The connection between Nora Redmann and Louisiana is her father’s transporting the portrait to California.” PRINCIPLES OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION The Louisiana Supreme Court stated in deReyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Ltd., : Due process requires that in order to subject a nonresident defendant to a personal judgment, the defendant must have certain minimum contacts with the forum state such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantia
  • Prado v. Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts, AG 611 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    I. JURISDICTION We find that the frequency and regularity of contacts by the Epsilongas with Louisiana (approximately every 12 days with few exceptions) is sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon this court even though the defendant, Asiento
  • Van Der Ploeg Schroen v. Daison 608 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • E & L Lumber Co. v. Ashy Enterprises 594 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • Folse v. Western Atlas Intern., Inc. 593 So. 2d 341 La. 1992
    This court similarly rejected the use of analogous judicial opinions for showings of fact in this court's opinion in DeReyes v. Marine Management and Consulting, Inc.