Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Miller, 571 So. 2d 603.

72 citing documents.

State v. Dixon 685 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. McMooain 680 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Steward 681 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
the Louisiana Supreme Court described the two tests as follows: [Under] the test in Blockburger v. United States, [ 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
State v. Smith 676 So. 2d 1068 La. 1996
State v. Washington 670 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Washington 670 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Rhodes 657 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
also, Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct.
State v. Ellis 657 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Vaughn, supra , State v. Didier, 262 La.
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
State v. Williams 647 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Burton 649 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Bolden 639 So. 2d 721 La. 1994
State v. Johnson 631 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
4 Cir.), affirmed as amended, (La.App.
State v. Girouard 615 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Jack 614 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
4th Cir.1990), affirmed as amended
State v. Harrison 612 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Thornton 611 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
the Supreme Court stated that it has principally relied upon the "same evidence" test in evaluating double jeopardy claims.
State v. Deslatte 610 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Carter 610 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
4th Cir.), aff'd as amended
State v. Ford 608 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Willis 591 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Clark 589 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991