DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bullock, 576 So. 2d 453.

21 citing documents.

  • Lonesome Development, LLC v. Town of Abita Springs La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
    W authority be punished."' ( La.
  • State v. Davis 273 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Chinn 91 So. 3d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Bullock (La.1991), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Calvin Charles Barfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    the defendant argued that the State did not prove that he was in the lawful custody of any law enforcement officer at the time of his escape as his flight had occurred after arrest but before he was jailed.
  • State v. Barfield 81 So. 3d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    *768 the defendant argued that the State did not prove that he was in the lawful custody of any law enforcement officer at the time of his escape as his flight had occurred after arrest but before he was jailed.
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Smith 2 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Davis 993 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    -58 (La.1991) determined that where multiple counts are part of a single contemptuous episode, an appropriate penalty was concurrent sentences for contempt to run consecutively to the sentence on any underlying convictions.
  • State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    the court held that the term “lawful custody” within the simple escape statute, does not apply only to persons who have already been placed in jail facility, but can also apply to persons who have been arrested but not yet confined.
  • State v. Hood 943 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    the court held that the term "lawful custody" within the simple escape statute, does not apply only to persons who have already been placed in jail facility, but can also apply to persons who have been arrested but not yet confined.
  • Ledet v. Ledet 800 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Lee 787 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Black 757 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Duncan 738 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • HCNO SERVICES v. Secure Computing Systems 693 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    [12] In support of their argument, and State v. Woolridge, 95-971 (La.
  • State v. Hebert 688 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Smith 686 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the crimes of simple escape and resisting arrest by flight (La.R.S.
  • State v. Woolridge 670 So. 2d 1332 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Wise 644 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld six month sentences for three profane remarks that the defendant made to the trial judge.
  • State v. Wilson 623 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Sumlin 617 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993