Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hearold, 603 So. 2d 731.

1244 citing documents.

  • State v. Lewis 1 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App 2 Cir. 4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Clyde Milton Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. E. J. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Discussion Sufficiency of the Evidence “When issues are raised on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.”
  • State v. EJF 999 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Jones 999 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. E.J.F. 999 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    ^Discussion Sufficiency of the Evidence “When issues are raised on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.”
  • State v. Sudds 998 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.
  • State v. Brown 999 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.
  • State v. Lewis 1 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Damon Lee Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Bowie 997 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Adams 997 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Collins 998 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Butler 997 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Jones 998 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Mitchell 996 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Caston 996 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2d Cir.3/31/99), , *484 writ denied, 99-1078 (La.9/24/99), , State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Carroll 996 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Carroll 996 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Hendry 996 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Morris 996 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Strother 990 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 990 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    See State v. Marcantel, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/02), ; (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Timothy E. Robertson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    A ruling that the evidence is insufficient would necessitate an acquittal; thus
  • State v. Robertson 988 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    A ruling that the evidence is insufficient would necessitate an acquittal; thus
  • State v. Decay 989 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Carter 987 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Shaw 987 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    State v. Marcantel, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.4/3/02), ; (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Jacobs 987 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Presson 986 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ezekiel Maurice McGinnis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Cotrell Robinson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Thomas 981 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Tucker 981 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Robinson 981 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. McGinnis 981 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Simmons 983 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    for the general proposition that "an analysis of the sufficiency of the evidence properly includes an examination of both admissible and inadmissible evidence."
  • State v. Jones 985 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Taylor, 04-346, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Archie Louis Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir.1989); (footnote omitted).
  • State v. Carter 981 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir.1989); (footnote omitted).
  • State v. Davenport 978 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Robbins 979 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Dixon 982 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Wright 978 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Mathieu 980 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), .
  • State v. Dunbar 978 So. 2d 899 La. 2008
    see Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. 33 , 109 S.Ct.
  • State v. Woodard 977 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008