DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hearold, 603 So. 2d 731.

1244 citing documents.

  • State v. Divine 916 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.
  • State v. Williams 916 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Pickard 918 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • Explained State v. Weaver 917 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [3] on appeal, when issues are raised both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the sufficiency of the evidence should be determined first.
  • Explained State v. Lewis 917 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    [3] on appeal, when issues are raised both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the sufficiency of the evidence should be determined first.
  • State of Louisiana v. Darwin Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Since a ruling that the evidence was insufficient would necessitate an acquittal, we will address this assignment first
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    stated that, because a finding of insufficient evidence may result in an outright acquittal, sufficiency challenges should be addressed before other claims.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dustin K. Runyon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    stated that, because a finding of insufficient evidence may result in an outright acquittal, sufficiency challenges should be addressed before other claims.
  • State v. Gauthier 916 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Since a ruling that the evidence was insufficient would necessitate an acquittal, we will address this assignment first
  • State v. Runyon 916 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Wiley 914 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Gatti 914 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. McGinnis 917 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Mayeux, 94-105 (La.App.
  • State v. Bowers 909 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Wade 908 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Collins 910 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Echols 907 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 907 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Hunter 907 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. In the Interest of Q.U.O. 907 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Stevenson 908 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Turner 904 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Condley 904 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Mayeux, 94-105 *888 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. E.D.C. 903 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Mickens, 31,737 (La.App.
  • State v. Lai 902 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Watson 900 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Mills 900 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Yrle 901 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    we will address the sufficiency of the evidence issue first.
  • State v. Spears 896 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. McGee 895 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Hopkins 897 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, supra .
  • State v. Thompson 894 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    The reason for reviewing sufficiency first is that the accused may be entitled to an acquittal under Hudson v. Louisiana, 450 U.S. 40 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Young 895 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.
  • State v. Austin 900 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Strickland 900 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Robinson 896 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Because defendant's third assignment of error relates to sufficiency of evidence
  • State v. Pigford 892 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 1997-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Cowden 889 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Jason M. Reeves La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Reeves 890 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Carlton G. Monceaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Monceaux 885 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Benoit 885 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 8 (La.4/3/02), , State v. Woodhead, 03-1036, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State v. Shrader 881 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Hunter 882 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.04/02/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Bannister 882 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Dooley 882 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.04/02/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Rabun 880 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.04/02/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Jones 880 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .