Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hearold, 603 So. 2d 731.

1245 citing documents.

State v. Stevens 140 So. 3d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State in the Intrest of T. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
(footnote omitted), the court held in pertinent part: When issues are raised on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.
State ex rel. T.H. 140 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
(footnote omitted), the court held in pertinent part: When issues are raised on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.
State v. Ross 144 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Brown, 2008-1434, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Richardson 142 So. 3d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Le, 13-314 (La.App.
State v. Quezada 141 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
. we are required to ad *911 dress the assignment of error regarding sufficiency of the evidence first.
State of Louisiana v. Alcide Hypolite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Hypolite 139 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Lantibious A. Broussard AKA Lantipious A. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Mack 144 So. 3d 983 La. 2014
State v. Hankton 140 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 8 (La.4/3/02)
State v. Weathersby 140 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Marcantel, 2000-1629, p. 8 (La.4/3/02), ().
State v. Percy 137 So. 3d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Smith, 47,983 (La.App.2d Cir.5/15/13), .
State v. Magee 143 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Pete La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Pete 134 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
970 , 67 L.Ed.2d 30 (1981)
State v. Banks 134 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Smith, 47,983 (La.App.2d Cir.5/15/13), .
State v. Davis 134 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State in the Interest of S. D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Webb 133 So. 3d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. German 133 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Marcantel, 2000-1629, p. 8 (La.4/3/02)
State v. Augustine 133 So. 3d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Vessel 131 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that “[i]ntent is a condition of mind which is usually proved by evidence of circumstances from which intent may be inferred.” The Court identified five factors which are useful in determining whether circumstantial evidence is sufficient to prove the intent to dis
State v. Coleman 133 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Videau 131 So. 3d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Granger v. State, 12-2587 (La.4/26/13), ().
State v. Scott 131 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Marcantel, 2000-1629, p. 8 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Davis 131 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
because if the appellate court determines that the evidence was insufficient, then the defendant is entitled to an acquittal, and no further inquiry as to trial errors is necessary.
State v. Taylor 130 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 8 (La.4/3/02)
State v. Ruffin 131 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
(When the issues on appeal pertain to both sufficiency of the evidence and one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.).
State v. Phillips 130 So. 3d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Musacchia 131 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Khanh Le 131 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Brown 131 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 10/30/12) , , writ denied, 12-2587 (La.4/26/13), ().
State of Louisiana v. Paul Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Broussard 128 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hamdan 131 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cook 127 So. 3d 992 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2 Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State of Louisiana v. Jerry Anthony Brandon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State in the Interest of N. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Hearold , State v. Jones, 05–840 (La.App.
State ex rel. N.F. 124 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Jones, 05-840 (La.App.
State ex rel. S.J. 129 So. 3d 676 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
State v. Carter 128 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Richey 128 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Robyn B. Little Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Carol Noland Saltzman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Davis 129 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Saltzman 128 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Lavelle Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Williams 156 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Humphries 124 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Smith, 47,983 (La.