Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Strain, 585 So. 2d 540.

146 citing documents.

State v. Moore 958 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Honeycutt 953 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2d Cir.10/12/01), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.09/13/02)
State v. Jerred 953 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
and State v. Stevison, 1997-3132 (La.10/30/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Mack Henry Johnson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Johnson 944 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Gauthier 941 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Perez 930 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Simmons 924 So. 2d 137 La. 2006
The present record reveals that the district judge in 1995 by conducting an examination of various "[f]actors bearing on the validity of [the waiver] including the age, education, experience, background, competency and conduct of the accused," before accepting defendant's waiver of counsel and ensuing plea of no contest.
State v. Mendez 923 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
[20] State v. Bruce, supra, at 857 ().
State v. Moore 920 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Drumgole, 31,294 (La.
State v. Morris 917 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Drumgole, 31,294 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/98), .
State v. Citizen 898 So. 2d 325 La. 2005
792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963) [7]
State v. Brooks 882 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
(Emphasis added); State v. Munholland, 34,941 (La.App.2d Cir.10/12/01), , writ denied, 01-3077 (La.9/13/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Todd Durio La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Landry Parish guilty plea, Defendant contends that his court- appointed attorney failed to appear in court and that the trial court accepted his guilty plea without determining his “literacy, competency, understanding and volition” and without inquiring about his “age, education, work history, or background.” -44 (La.1991) (citations omitted) (footnotes omitted) (emphasis added), the supreme court stated: The right to counsel may be waived, but the accused must know of the right and intentionall
State v. Durio 878 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Landry Parish guilty plea, Defendant contends that his court-appointed attorney failed to appear in court and that the trial court accepted his guilty plea without determining his ‘literacy, competency, understanding and volition” and without inquiring about his “age, education, work history, or background.” -44 (La.1991) (citations omitted) (footnotes omitted) (emphasis added), the supreme court stated: The right to counsel may be waived, but the accused must know of the right and intentionally
State v. Frisella 868 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
-544 (La.1991); State v. Garrity, 97-958 (La.App.
State v. Nabak 864 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
-544 (La.1991); State v. Garrity, 97-958, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Robertson 864 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Guccione, 96-1049 (La.App.
State v. Bruce 864 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Turner 859 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Granier 857 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
-544 (La.1991), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: When an accused waives his right to counsel in pleading guilty to a misdemeanor, the trial judge should expressly advise him of his right to counsel and to appointed counsel if he is indigent.
State v. Verdin 845 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
No authority was cited for this position, and such a wherein the court noted the distinctions between the waiver of counsel at a felony trial (wherein advice of the penalty range is required) and the waiver of counsel in an uncomplicated misdemeanor guilty plea.
State v. Perez 831 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Batchelor 823 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Bridgewater , XXXX-XXXX (La.1/15/02), ; (La.
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
State v. Kerwin 821 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Kirsch 815 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Hight 810 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Inzina, supra .
State v. Munholland 797 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Hinson 797 So. 2d 32 La. 2001
State v. Rodrigue 795 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), ; (La.
State v. Lowry 791 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
-544 (La.1991), the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth several factors to consider in determining whether a defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel such as "age, education, experience, background, competency and conduct of the accused, as well as the nature, complexity and seriousness of t
State v. Brockwell 797 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Roth 786 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Stevison, 97-03122 (La.10/30/98)
State v. Marler 797 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Filer, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/30/00), (per curiam) ( , 544 n. 7 (La.1991)).
State v. Theriot 782 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), ; Garrity, 708 So.2d at 1097 .
State v. Pendleton 776 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), ; -544 (La.1991).
State v. Luna 772 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
1461 (1938); State v. Price, 96-680 (La.App.
State v. Richard 769 So. 2d 1177 La. 2000
art. 556.1 to the trial court's use of an en masse Boykin procedure, the validity of any guilty plea "`depends upon the circumstances of each case."' State v. Filer, 00-0073, p. 2 (La.6/30/00), ( n. 7 (La.1991)).
State v. Frickey 769 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Filer 762 So. 2d 1080 La. 2000
State v. Barron 758 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Potts, 32,252 (La.App.2d Cir.8/18/99)
State v. McKinney 754 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Boudreaux 756 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Stevison, 97-3122 (La.10/30/98), ; State v. Garrity, 97-958 (La.
State v. Norman 756 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Held 748 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975)
State v. Hodges 749 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
citing Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708 , 68 S.Ct.
State v. Flanagan 744 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 (1962)
State v. Pickett 746 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Flores 747 So. 2d 524 La. 1999