DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Walters, 582 So. 2d 317.

27 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. M. L. Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    4 Cir.), writ denied, La.
  • State v. ML JR. 35 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Wilson 26 So. 3d 210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Uloho 875 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Winding 787 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 10/25/94) , , writ denied, 94-2880 (La.5/5/95), ; (La.
  • State v. Dean 789 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Carter 779 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 10/25/94), , writ denied 94-2880 (La.5/5/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Banks 779 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    App. 4 Cir. 10/25/94), , writ denied 94-2880 (La.5/5/95), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Nogess 729 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Short 725 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Hubbard 708 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Jackson, supra ; (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 704 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Silva 699 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Jackson 694 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Woodberry 686 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Meyers 683 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Williams 672 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Phillips 670 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Jackson 657 So. 2d 1391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Hunter 654 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Grubbs 644 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Carr 635 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    In challenging the constitutionality of an out-of-court identification procedure and, hence, its admissibility in court, “the defendant must prove that the identification was suggestive and that a likelihood of misidenti-fieation resulted from the identification procedure.” (La.App.
  • Distinguished State v. Hawthorne 623 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    We believe that a (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 619 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Smith 596 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Walters 591 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Walters 584 So. 2d 1171 La. 1991
    Prior report: La.App., .