DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Greco, 583 So. 2d 825.

18 citing documents.

  • State v. Smith 144 So. 3d 867 La. 2014
    of crime against nature not unconstitutionally overbroad as they affect conduct rather than speech); State v. Brown, 94-1290 (La.1/17/95), (statute which enhances penalties for persons convicted of distributing narcotics within 1,000 feet of school property not unconstitutionally overbroad as the statute affects conduct rather than speech and the conduct is illegal); (statute prohibiting commercial purchase of fish from a person who does not possess a valid fishing license not subject to overbre
  • State ex rel. L.C. 126 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hair 784 So. 2d 1269 La. 2001
    see also Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 358 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brenan 772 So. 2d 64 La. 2000
    -29 (La.1991); Accord Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 614 , 93 S.Ct.
  • State v. Norfleet 721 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Jordan 719 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Byrd 708 So. 2d 401 La. 1998
    see also Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 358 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bentley 692 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
    the Court stated the following concerning vagueness: "[A] statute is unconstitutionally vague if any ordinary person of reasonable intelligence is not capable of discerning its meaning and conforming his conduct to it.
  • State v. Sandifer 679 So. 2d 1324 La. 1996
  • State v. Denomes 674 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    -829 (La.1991); (La.App.
  • State v. Wingate 668 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Ganier 660 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Brown 648 So. 2d 872 La. 1995
  • State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
  • State v. Baxley 633 So. 2d 142 La. 1994
  • State v. Gamberella 633 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Anseman 607 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    (5th Cir.1991), Additionally, a penal statute must provide adequate standards by which the guilt or innocence of the accused can be determined.
  • State v. Brown 606 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    the Court stated the following concerning vagueness: Defendant contends that the statute is unconstitutionally vague.