Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dobson, 578 So. 2d 533.

45 citing documents.

State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Goldston 868 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Penns 758 So. 2d 776 La. 1999
4th Cir.1993) (on reh'g); -35 (La.App.
State v. Davis 732 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 3/15/94) , , (La.App.
State v. Williams 660 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Campbell 657 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Duncan 648 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Williams 637 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Rodriguez 635 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
4th Cir.1993) on rehearing; (La.App.
State v. Bush 634 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Wilson 631 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Prior to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Sullivan v. Louisiana , (La.App.
State v. Cleveland 630 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Ford 631 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Broussard 631 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
4 Cir.1993), on rehearing; (La.App.
State v. Berry 630 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Wolfe 630 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. James 627 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
App. 4th Cir.1993) this Court was evenly divided en banc (6-6) (La.App.
State v. Berniard 625 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Harris 624 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Johnson 622 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Johnson 619 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Sam 623 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Montegut 618 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Quatrevingt 617 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Whitley 606 So. 2d 1292 La. 1992
211 , 116 L.Ed.2d 170 (1991), and that the Cage error is subject to the requirements of the contemporaneous objection rule in non-capital cases, (La.App.
State v. Frazier 599 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Wright 598 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Young 596 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Davis 596 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Desmond 593 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Williams 591 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Williams 591 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Carter 589 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Johnson 589 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Dobson 588 So. 2d 1110 La. 1991
Prior report: La.App., .
State v. Harrison 588 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Cuneo 587 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Jarrell 587 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Pollard 585 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Taylor 585 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Barrow 582 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Clark 581 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Baker 582 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
This Court, (1991) held that, absent a proper objection, arguments on improper jury charges would not be considered.
State v. Williams 580 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991