Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Armour, 564 So. 2d 360.

13 citing documents.

State v. Duhon 674 So. 2d 944 La. 1996
ts because they were not executed under oath; State v. Rylee, supra , a rule to revoke, although constituting a summons for the purpose of initiating the revocation proceeding, did not amount to an affidavit because it was not executed under oath; State v. Johnson, supra , since the rule to revoke probation was not executed under oath, the revocation proceedings were invalid; (La.App.
State v. Stelly 614 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
On application to the Supreme Court, , (La.App.
State v. Stelly 600 So. 2d 623 La. 1992
State v. Clark 600 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Johnson 602 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Williams 598 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Krummel 593 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Forest, supra; (La.App.
State v. Rylee 591 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Loren 587 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
5th Cir.1990), writ denied ; , (La.App.
State v. Norwood 587 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Sibley 583 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
While a defendant has no right to appeal a probation revocation, we have, in the interest of judicial economy, (La.App.
State v. Forest 571 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Morgan 567 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990