Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Smith, 578 So. 2d 1150.

68 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Christopher J. Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Brown 164 So. 3d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State of Louisiana v. Warren Fuselier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
overruled by State v. Harris, 93-1098 (La.
State v. Fuselier 885 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
overruled by State v. Harris, 93-1098 (La.1/5/96), ; overruled by State v. Harris, 93-1098 (La.1/5/96), ; overruled by State v. Harris, 93-1098 (La.1/5/96), ; and State v.
State v. Brown 737 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Harris 665 So. 2d 1164 La. 1996
conflict with the views expressed herein, they are overruled.
State v. Williams 660 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State ex rel. Burger v. State 661 So. 2d 1373 La. 1995
The district court is therefore ordered to address the merits of relator’s claims that he received an illegally lenient sentence, and State ex rel.
State ex rel. Cooper v. State 660 So. 2d 867 La. 1995
The district court is therefore ordered to address the merits of relator’s and State ex rel.
State ex rel. Dave v. Stalder 640 So. 2d 1328 La. 1994
Relator’s and State ex rel.
State v. Wright 640 So. 2d 1322 La. 1994
art. 835 and State ex rel.
State v. Cooper 640 So. 2d 1322 La. 1994
art. 835 and State ex rel.
State ex rel. Herbert v. Whitley 640 So. 2d 1323 La. 1994
State ex rel. Baylis v. State 640 So. 2d 1321 La. 1994
art. 835 and State ex rel.
State v. Thompson 640 So. 2d 1321 La. 1994
State ex rel. Smith v. State 640 So. 2d 1323 La. 1994
art. 835 and State ex rel.
State ex rel. Leban v. State 640 So. 2d 1323 La. 1994
art. 835 and the consider *1324 and State ex rel.
State ex rel. Johnson v. Day 637 So. 2d 1062 La. 1994
The district court is therefore ordered to address the merits of relator’s (La.
State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Day 637 So. 2d 1062 La. 1994
State v. Carr 635 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
and State v. Desdunes, supra, the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated the proper considerations which a judge must evaluate in considering a motion to correct an illegally lenient sentence: “Since correction of an ‘illegally lenient’ sentence will usually result
State v. Felder 634 So. 2d 363 La. 1994
To the extent that resentencing will take place before the same judge who imposed relator’s original sentence, State ex rel.
Wright v. Shea 634 So. 2d 364 La. 1994
To the extent that resentencing will take place before the same judge who imposed relator’s original sentence, State ex rel.
State ex rel. Washington v. State 629 So. 2d 1156 La. 1993
15:529.1 is vacated, and State ex rel.
State ex rel. Wheeler v. Shea 629 So. 2d 1161 La. 1993
The amended sentence is vacated, and State ex rel.
State v. Bell 629 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Houston 629 So. 2d 1142 La. 1993
Relator’s amended sentence of June 30, 1992, is vacated, and State ex rel.
State ex rel. Jarrow v. State 629 So. 2d 1142 La. 1993
Accordingly, and State ex rel.
State ex rel. Youngblood v. State 629 So. 2d 1143 La. 1993
Accordingly, and State ex rel.
State ex rel. Norwood v. State 629 So. 2d 406 La. 1993
Relator’s sentences are vacated
State ex rel. Lee v. State 629 So. 2d 405 La. 1993
Relator’s sentence is vacated, and State ex rel.
State v. Montgomery 629 So. 2d 405 La. 1993
Relator’s amended sentence is vacated, and the district court is ordered to resentenee the relator in open court in accor *406 and State ex rel.
State v. Morrison 629 So. 2d 375 La. 1993
The amended sentence is vacated
State v. Hupp 626 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Bernard 617 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
” That case requires, at p. 1150, the record should reflect consideration by the resentencing judge of the intent of the judge who imposed the original sentence, whether it be the same judge or another judge.
State v. Bell 615 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State ex rel. Hudson v. Whitley 607 So. 2d 548 La. 1992
Relator’s sentences are vacated, State ex rel.
State v. Flowers 598 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Clark 593 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State ex rel. Monroe v. Whitley 587 So. 2d 685 La. 1991
Relator’s sentence is vacated
State ex rel. Hudson v. Whitley 584 So. 2d 668 La. 1991
Relator’s sentences are vacated, State ex rel.
State ex rel. Bazille v. Smith 584 So. 2d 663 La. 1991
Relator’s sentence is vacated, State ex rel.
State ex rel. Ardis v. Smith 584 So. 2d 663 La. 1991
State v. McRae 584 So. 2d 663 La. 1991
Relator’s sentence is vacated, State ex rel.
State v. Lawrence 584 So. 2d 664 La. 1991
Relator’s sentence is vacated, State ex rel.
State ex rel. Bridges v. State 584 So. 2d 664 La. 1991
Relator’s sentences are vacated, State ex rel.
State ex rel. Powell v. State 584 So. 2d 664 La. 1991
Relator’s sentences are vacated, State ex rel.
State ex rel. Callahan v. Smith 584 So. 2d 666 La. 1991
Relator’s sentence is vacated, State ex rel.
Williams v. Lynn 584 So. 2d 667 La. 1991
Relator’s sentence is vacated, State ex rel.
State ex rel. Parker v. Lynn 584 So. 2d 668 La. 1991
Relator’s sentences are vacated, State ex rel.
State ex rel. Green v. Warden 584 So. 2d 666 La. 1991
Relator’s sentence for armed robbery is vacated, and this case is remanded to the district court for consideration and resentencing in accordance with the procedures and guidelines set forth in State v. Desdunes, 579 *

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by