Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 566 So. 2d 981.

35 citing documents.

  • Charlyne R. Alfred v. Joseph J. Trapp, US Agencies Casualty Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
    App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, ( La.
  • State v. Davis 958 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    3 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. W.D.F., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Winn v. Nation 893 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    1st Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Reed 809 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • LeBlanc v. Babin 786 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    1st Cir.), writ denied, (citing Radar v. Duke Transp.
  • State v. Jordan 719 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    5th Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Taylor 714 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    3d Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.
  • Best Fishing, Inc. v. Rancatore 706 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    1st Cir.), writ denied, Dufour v. Westlawn Cemeteries, Inc., 94-81, p. 4 (La.
  • State v. Jack 700 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Silva 685 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    3 Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Gerard 685 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    5 Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Green 683 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Armstrong 683 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    5 Cir.1990), unit denied, the court stated it was not error for the trial court to allow a blanket assertion by a co-defendant of his Fifth Amendment privilege where the co-defendant was charged with participation in the same crime as the individual on trial and it was apparent that the questioning would be devoted to a subject matt
  • State v. Smith 680 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    3rd Cir.1990), writ denied, the Court stated the following regarding the open field doctrine: ...
  • Mobley v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 674 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    1st Cir.), writ denied, (citing Radar v. Duke Transp.
  • State v. Carroll 670 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Wright 650 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    5 Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.
  • State v. Slang 646 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    5th Cir.1990), writ denied, this Court set forth the constitutional jurisprudence regarding excessive sentences: The Courts are prohibited from imposing cruel, excessive, or unusual punishment by article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974.
  • State v. Jones 645 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    App. 5th Cir.1990), writ denied, this Court set forth the constitutional jurisprudence regarding excessive sentences: The courts are prohibited from imposing cruel, excessive, or unusual punishment by Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974.
  • State v. Clark 643 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Martin 638 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    App. 5th Cir.1990), writ denied, this Court stated the following regarding excessive sentences: *415 The courts are prohibited from imposing cruel, excessive, or unusual punishment by Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974.
  • State v. Cooper 635 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    App. 5 Cir.1990) writ denied, this Court summarized the jurisprudence regarding excessive sentences: The courts are prohibited from imposing cruel, excessive, or unusual punishment by Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974.
  • Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. 630 So. 2d 759 La. 1994
    1st Cir.), writ denied, (citing Radar v. Duke Transp.
  • State v. Simpson 629 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    App. 3rd Cir.), writ denied, *475 (La.1990), the police were notified that Broussard was beating his wife, and were summoned to the home by a man who lived in the Broussard home and was dating Broussard's sister.
  • State v. Hill 628 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    5 Cir.1990), unit denied, this Court summed up applicable jurisprudence the following regarding excessive sentences: The courts are prohibited from imposing cruel, excessive, or unusual punishment by Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Con- *110 stitutíon of 1974.
  • State v. Fisher 626 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    3rd Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Joseph 619 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    5 Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.
  • Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. 613 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Payne 612 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    (5th Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.
  • Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co. 597 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Brown 598 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    3d Cir.1990), writ denied, the police found a knife in a trash pile forty feet behind the house where the defendant had murdered his wife.
  • State v. Cook 598 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    5th Cir.1990), writ denied, this court stated as follows: *428 "The courts are prohibited from imposing cruel, excessive or unusual punishment by Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974.
  • State v. Jack 596 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    3rd Cir.1990), writ denied
  • State v. Parker 594 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    5 Cir.1990), writ denied, for a general review of the applicable law on excessive sentencing.