Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite White v. Monsanto Co., 585 So. 2d 1205.

182 citing documents.

Cook v. American Gateway Bank 49 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Lloyd v. Shady Lake Nursing Home, Inc. 47 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Ronald Ables v. Frank C. Minvielle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
the court stated: The meaning of “intent” is that the person who acts either (1) consciously desires the physical result of his act, whatever the likelihood of that result happening from his conduct; or (2) knows that that result is substantially
Ables v. Minvielle 22 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
the court stated: The meaning of “intent” is that the person who acts either (1) consciously desires the physical result of his act, whatever the likelihood of that result happening from his conduct; or (2) knows that that result is substantially certain to follow from his conduct, whatever his desire may b
Solow v. Heard McElroy & Vestal, L.L.P. 7 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Brungardt v. Summitt 7 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Roscoe v. Hastings 999 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that a plaintiff seeking damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress must prove: (1) that the conduct of the defendant was extreme and outrageous; (2) that the emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff was severe; and (3) that the defendant desired to in
Groff v. SOUTHWEST BEVERAGE CO., INC. 997 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Robert Groff v. Southwest Beverage Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Barringer v. Robertson 994 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Kennedy-Fagan v. Estate of Graves 993 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Further, the trial court found that, even viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff-in-reconvention, Julie Fagan's actions were not extreme in degree or, quoting White , "beyond all possible bounds of decency and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community."
White v. Golden 982 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that a plaintiff seeking damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress must prove: "(1) that the conduct of the defendant was extreme and outrageous; (2) that the emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff was severe and (3) *245 that the defendant desired
Elta Moss v. Winfred Thomas Barrett III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
the plaintiff was severe; and (3) that the defendant desired to inflict severe emotional distress or knew that severe emotional distress would be 7 certain or substantially certain to result from his conduct.” LaBove v. Raftery, 00-1394, 00-1423, pp. 16-17 (La.11/28/01), ().
Moss v. Barrett 977 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
LaBove v. Raftely, 00-1394, 00-1423, pp. 16-17 (La.11/28/01), , ().
Hankton v. City of New Orleans 973 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Roton v. Vernon E. Faulconer, Inc. 966 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
the court stated: The meaning of "intent" is that the person who acts either (1) consciously desires the physical result of his act, whatever the likelihood of that result happening from his conduct; or (2) knows that that result is substantially certain to follow from his conduct, whatever his desire may b
Murray v. City of Baton Rouge 962 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Ostrowiecki v. Aggressor Fleet, Ltd. 965 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Louisiana Ag Credit v. Livestock Producers 954 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
e Supreme Court stated: While each incident alleged by Ms. Bustamento may not necessarily be classified as "outrageous," when her allegations are viewed properly as a whole, consisting of a continuing flow of related acts, by the same actor, stretching across a two-year span, the cumulative effect of them could serve to render such actions "outrageous" and actionable under White [v. Monsanto Co., ].
Spencer Bertrand v. Robert Moore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In the Written Reasons for Judgment, the trial court defined this provision as follows: (La.
Jimmy Vidrine v. Constructors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In the Written Reasons for Judgment, the trial court defined this provision as follows: (La.
Malcolm Brasseaux v. Town of Church Point La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the court stated: [I]n order to recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must establish (1) that the conduct of the defendant was extreme and outrageous; (2) that the emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff was severe; and (3) that the defenda
Brasseaux v. TOWN OF CHURCH POINT 951 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
the court stated: [I]n order to recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must establish (1) that the conduct of the defendant was extreme and outrageous; (2) that the emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff was severe; and (3) that the defendant desired to inflict sev
Martha Richard v. Michael Fruge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
: [I]n order to recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must establish (1) that the conduct of the defendant was extreme and outrageous; (2) that the emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff was severe; and (3) that the defendant desired to infl
Delton Ray Coutee v. Rayland K. Beurlot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
a plaintiff must establish (1) that the conduct of the defendant was extreme and outrageous; (2) that the emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff was severe; and (3) that the defendant desired to inflict severe emotional distress or knew that severe emotional distress would be certain or substantially certain to result from his conduct.”
Coutee v. Beurlot 943 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Alvarez v. Clasen 946 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Tarita Manor v. Abbeville General Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
the supreme court explained the meaning of “intentional act” under Revised Statute 23:1032(B): [T]he person who acts either (1) consciously desires the physical result of his act, whatever the likelihood of that res
Manor v. ABBEVILLE GENERAL HOSP. 940 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
the supreme court explained the meaning of "intentional act" under Revised Statute 23:1032(B): [T]he person who acts either (1) consciously desires the physical result of his act, whatever the likelihood of that result happening from his conduct; or (2) knows that that result is substantially certain
Almerico v. Dale 927 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
St. Germain v. Coulon 922 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Whittington v. Kelly 917 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Michael Joseph Viator v. Wendell R. Miller, Indiv. as in His Capacity as Judge for the 31st Judidical … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
l distress suffered by the plaintiff was severe; and (3) that the defendant desired to inflict severe emotional distress or knew that severe emotional distress would be certain or -6- substantially certain to result from his conduct.” LaBove v. Raftery, 00-1394, 00- 1493, pp. 16-17 (La.11/28/01), ().
Viator v. Miller 900 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
LaBove v. Raftery, 00-1394, 00-1423, pp. 16-17 (La.11/28/01), , ().
Clark v. Acco Systems, Inc. 899 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Co., 1999-2522 (La.08/31/00), , citing
Alcorn v. City of Baton Rouge 898 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Bustamento, 607 So.2d at 538
Baker v. LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER 889 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Michael B. Sparks v. Mary Elizabeth Donovan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
11/22/02), a panel of this court observed that, in order to prevail in a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must prove the following elements: “(1) that the conduct of the defendant was extreme and outrageous; (2) that the emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff
Sparks v. Donovan 884 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 7/10/02), , writ denied, 02-2378 *1282 (La.11/22/02), , a panel of this court observed that, in order to prevail in a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must prove the following elements: “(1) that the conduct of the defendant was extreme and outrageous; (2) that the emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff wa
Jarrell v. Miller 882 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
art. 2315.6 (requiring severe, debilitating and foreseeable emotional distress for awards to persons who witness the injury of a relative); (awards for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress require proof that the conduct of defendant was extreme and outrageous and the emotional distress suffered by *649 plaintiff was severe); La.
Martin v. Comm-Care Corp. 880 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
While we are allowing this bare claim to proceed
Cathy Darden v. R. Craig Smith and the Ferriday Villa Partnership La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Darden v. Smith 879 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
LaBove v. Raftery, 00-1394, p. 16-17 (La.11/28/01), , (La.
Kevin H. James v. Red Simpson, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
the supreme court explained the meaning of “intentional act” under Revised Statute 23:1032(B): [T]he person who acts either (1) consciously desires the physical result of his act, whatever the likelihood of that res
James v. Red Simpson, Inc. 856 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
the supreme court explained the meaning of “intentional act” under Revised Statute 23:1032(13): [T]he person who acts either (1) consciously desires the physical result of his act, whatever the likelihood of that result happening from his conduct; or (2) knows that that result is substantially certain
Cortes v. Lynch 846 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
King v. Phelps Dunbar, LLP 844 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Harris v. Federal Fibre Mills Condominium Ass'n 843 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Singleton v. St. Charles Parish 833 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
which set out the following principles: In order to recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must establish that the conduct of the defendant was extreme and outrageous, that the emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff was severe, and that the defendant desired to inflict s
Cole v. Department of Public Safety 825 So. 2d 1134 La. 2002
Mouton v. Blue Marlin Specialty Tools, Inc., 2001-648 (La.App.