Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc., 588 So. 2d 350.

171 citing documents.

Warren v. Maddox Hauling 832 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
[10] Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc., (La.
Emilien v. CONSTRUCTION 832 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Bruno v. Harbert International Inc., , Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., (La.
Johnson v. Louisiana Container Co. 834 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
389 (La.1922); Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc., Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530 (La.1/14/94); ; Coates v. Byrd Constr.
Burge v. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n 819 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
389 (La.1922); Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc., Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530 (La.1/14/94); ; Coates v. Byrd Constr.
Adams v. Bayou Steel Corp. 813 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[5] Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc., Cochennic v. Dillard's Dept. Store Warehouse, 95-705 (La.App.
Parker v. ADM Milling Co. 804 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
[13] Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc., Ziegler v. Bagby Construction, supra .
Rodriguez v. Freeman Decorating Co. 799 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
828 , (1959); Nelson [v. Roadway Express, Inc., (1991)], supra (collecting cases).
Thibodeaux v. Sunland Const. 782 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc., (La.
Balthazar v. Guillory Racing Farms 802 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc., Cochennic v. Dillard's Dept. Store Warehouse, 95-705 (La.App.
Lyons v. Bechtel Corp. 788 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Inc., *41 (La.1992); Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Skipper v. Acadian Oaks Hosp. 762 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
ting forth which injuries are compensable under the workers' compensation scheme or what constitutes an "accident" under the workers' compensation scheme, the general rule that the governing law in a compensation actions is that which was in effect at the time of the alleged injury, enunciated in such cases as Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc., Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., and Smith v. Exxon Chem.
Taylor v. Columbian Chemicals 744 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, 593 So.2d at 362
McCoy v. KMB Transport, Inc. 734 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1992); Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., Leon v. Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co., 151 La.
Peloquin v. Eunice News 737 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Nelson v. Roadway Ex-press, Inc.
Araujo v. Marriott Corp. 731 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir. 1/17/96), ; Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc.
Parkes v. Prien Pines Nursery 722 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Tate v. Gaylord Container 720 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Martin v. Olsten Indus. Services 718 So. 2d 404 La. 1998
Id.; Nelson [v. Roadway Express, Inc., ].
Nowlin v. Breck Const. Co. 715 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Gary v. Econo-Mart 10 716 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Id.; Nelson [v. Roadway Express, Inc., (La.
Romero v. Chabillis' Tire Service, Inc. 714 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Malone & Johnson, supra; Nelson [v. Roadway Express, Inc., ].
Cook v. Kaldi's Coffee House 706 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., (La.
Kortz v. Colt Energy Services, Inc. 698 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc., Cochennic v. Dillard's Dept. Store Warehouse, 95-705 (La.
Moore v. Popeye's Fried Chicken 697 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Kendrick v. Bill Liberto Enterprises 698 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
See generally, Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc., *26 (La.1991); Walker v. Gaines P. Wilson & Son, Inc., (La.App.
Robinson v. Integrated Tank Services, Inc. 695 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc., Cochennic v. Dillard's Dept. Store Warehouse, 95-CA- 705 La.App.
Gordon v. Sandersons Farms 693 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Beaird Industries, Inc. v. Ebarb 690 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Foster v. Liberty Rice Mill 690 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
See generally, Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc., Walker v. Gaines P. Wilson & Son, Inc., (La.App.
Coats v. American Tel. & Tel. Co. 681 So. 2d 1243 La. 1996
23:1031; Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Lucius v. HB Zachry Co. 673 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc.
Boyette v. Riverwood International 674 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
rth which injuries are compensable under the workers’ compensation scheme or what constitutes an “accident” under the work *1104 ers’ compensation scheme, the general rule that the governing law in a compensation action is that which was in effect at the time of the alleged injury, enunciated in such cases as Bruno v. Harbert Int’l., Inc., Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., and Smith v. Exxon Chem.
Boyette v. Riverwood International 669 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
ting forth which injuries are compensable under the workers’ compensation scheme or what constitutes an “accident” under the workers’ compensation scheme, the general rule that the governing law in a compensation action is that which was in effect at the time of the alleged injury, enunciated in such cases as Bruno v. Harbert Int’l., Inc., Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., and Smith v. Exxon Chem.
Carrier v. Debarge's College Junction 673 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Barbre v. Stevens Collision Center 671 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Inc., “[a]n employer who fails to investigate an employee’s compensation claim subjects itself to statutory penalties and attorney’s fees.
Cochennic v. Dillard's Dept. Store Warehouse 668 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc.
Martin v. Elmwood Medical Center 665 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Stevens v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 663 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Bruno v. Harbert Int'l Inc., 593 So.2d at 362
Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co. 660 So. 2d 7 La. 1995
1992); Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., and Smith v. Exxon Chem.
Garner v. Sheats & Frazier 663 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., (La.
Lacava v. Albano Cleaners 656 So. 2d 990 La. 1995
Moreover, this Court has held that an “unjustified belief that an employee’s injury did not Uresult from an accident does not excuse failure to pay worker’s compensation benefits.” Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc.
LeBlanc v. Cajun Painting Inc. 654 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Lacava v. Albano Cleaners 653 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc., (La.
Smith v. Radisson Suite Hotel New Orleans 650 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., (La.
McCoy v. Monroe Timber Co. 647 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Id.; Nelson, [v. Roadway Express, Inc.], supra [ ].
Robin v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 646 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
2nd Cir.), reversed on other grounds, ) which suggested that the amended 1021(1) was meant to exclude from coverage persons who are worn down by their work rather then immediately crippled by it, as such a view is inconsistent with the purpose of the worker's compensation scheme.
Perot v. Natchitoches Parish Hospital 643 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc.
Ceasar v. Crispy Cajun Restaurant 643 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
828 , (1959); Nelson [v. Roadway Express, Inc., ], supra (collecting cases).
Davis v. United General Insurance Co. 639 So. 2d 1180 La. 1994
See Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., Leon v. Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co., 151 La.
Laneaux v. Opelousas Artificial Kidney Center 640 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc., Dowden v. Liberty Mut.