Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Miller v. Leonard, 588 So. 2d 79.

64 citing documents.

Dauzat v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest 657 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Thompson v. Chevron USA, Inc. 653 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
concerning the duties incumbent upon a left-turning motorist, (La.App.
Smith v. State Dept. of Health & Hosp. 650 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Glenn v. State Farm Mut.
Dennis v. Allstate Ins. Co. 645 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Clark v. Lockhart 638 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
After trial on the merits, the judge in written reasons for judgment stated that the factual evidence was in irreconcilable conflict concerning which vehicle was protected by a favorable signal, and therefore, he dismissed the plaintiffs suit with prejudice for the failure to prove the claim by a preponderance of the evidence
Terro v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 631 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Stapleton v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp. 627 So. 2d 1358 La. 1993
Estate of Willis v. Cairns 630 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Releford v. Doe 618 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Glenn v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS., CO. 617 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Nejame v. Hamiter 614 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Action of the trial court By written opinion the trial court commented that it was in the "most difficult situation," two credible and candid witnesses with mutually exclusive and irreconcilable versions of how the accident occurred, (La.
Cadle Co. v. Dumesnil 610 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Miller v. Leonard 607 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Gatti v. City of Shreveport 599 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992