Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kuebler v. Martin, 578 So. 2d 113.

124 citing documents.

Cooper v. Public Belt Railroad 776 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Goulas v. DENBURY MANAGEMENT, INC. 774 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Green v. Alaska Nat. Ins. Co. 759 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Guidry v. First Nat. Bank of Commerce 755 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Landry v. Les Fontaine Funeral Home, Inc. 755 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
|7The supreme court has stated that “[w]hen it can reasonably do so, the court should maintain a petition against a peremptory exception so as to afford the litigant an opportunity to present his evidence.”
Dupree v. City of New Orleans 745 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Arledge v. Sherrill 738 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Everything on Wheels Subaru
Ansalve v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 737 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (La.
Roshto v. Brown 741 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
(citations omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court commented on the deference a court should give to petitions: Pleadings must be construed reasonably so as to afford litigants their day in court, to arrive at the truth, and to do substantial justice.
Milling, Benson, Woodward, Hillyer, Pierson & Miller L.L.P. v. American Marine Holding Co. 729 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Everything on Wheels Subaru
Gardner v. ZULU SOCIAL AID & PLEASURE CLUB 729 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Krebs v. Mull 727 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Devers v. Southern University 712 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Jenkins v. Waste Management of Louisiana, Inc. 709 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Wusthoff v. Bally's Casino Lakeshore Resort, Inc. 709 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Walters v. Rubicon Inc. 706 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Albarado v. Abadie 703 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Caronia v. McKenzie's Pastry Shoppes 700 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
ALLIED SIGNAL INC. v. Jackson 691 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Bandaries v. Winnfield Life Insurance Co. 689 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Gautreaux v. Rheem Mfg. Co. 694 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Long v. Long 684 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Landrum v. Board of Com'rs 685 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
West v. Hilton Hotels Corp. 684 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Winners Circle of Homes Inc. v. Barnette 681 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Reis v. Fenasci & Smith, 93-1785 (La.App.
Sanders v. Gore 676 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Walker v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets 671 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Matheny v. Greer 668 So. 2d 1359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc., 92-1544, 92-1545 (La.App.
Fussell v. Reed 664 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Garcia 672 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Buller v. Falcon Rice Mill, Inc. 664 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
23:1272 provides that an order approving a compromise agreement shall not be set aside “except for fraud or misrepresentation made by any party.” “The purpose of an exception of no cause of action is to determine the sufficiency in law of the petition.” ,114 |4(La,1991) (cites omitted); Trahan v. McManus, 94-167 (La.App.
Woodland Ridge Ass'n v. Cangelosi 671 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Ellvog, Inc. v. Schnadelbach 661 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
cert, denied, 459 U.S. 969 , 103 S.Ct.
Guilbeaux v. Times of Acadiana, Inc. 661 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
GNC Ltd. Partnership v. Dooley 657 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Guste v. Hibernia Nat. Bank in New Orleans 655 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Aymond v. Rabalais 657 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Becnel v. United Gas Pipeline Co. 655 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Trahan v. McManus 653 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Zar v. Gaudet 648 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Campbell v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 647 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
White v. White 641 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Cheatham v. Cox 642 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Montalvo v. Sondes 637 So. 2d 127 La. 1994
Everything on Wheels Subaru
Lopinto v. Tessier 637 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Bordelon v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 640 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Reis v. Fenasci & Smith 635 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Dubroc v. Allstate Ins. Co. 633 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Harrison v. Redd 635 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
LeJeune v. Causey 634 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994