Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., 593 So. 2d 634.

53 citing documents.

Overruled Hanover Ins. Co. v. Riceland Aviation, Inc. 269 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Duhon , , was overruled on other grounds by Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc.
Overruled Hanover Insurance Company v. Riceland Aviation, Inc. Consolidated With United States Aircraft Insurance Group v. Global Tower, LLC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
4 Duhon, was overruled on other grounds by Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc.
Populis v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 222 So. 3d 975 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
5 Cir. 5/27/98) ; , citing Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., (La.
Rotorcraft Leasing, LLC v. H.E.R.O.S., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Our sister circuit rejected this argument relying on the Louisiana Supreme Court decision in Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., (La.
Rotorcraft Leasing, LLC v. H.E.R.O.S., Inc. 217 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Our sister circuit rejected this argument relying on the Louisiana Supreme Court decision in Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., (La.
Welch v. Daniels 207 So. 3d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 5/30/01) , ; Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., (La.
Viator v. LeBeouf Bros. Towing, L.L.C. 102 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., -638 (La.1992); Milstead v. Diamond M. Offshore, Inc., 95-2446, p. 7 (La.7/2/96), .
Graham v. Offshore Specialty Fabricators, Inc. 37 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc.
Tucker v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. 9 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
As the Louisiana Supreme Court explained in Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., this applies even to helicopters such as the one at issue in the instant appeal: Generally, federal maritime jurisdiction is invoked whenever an accident occurs on the high seas and in furtherance of an activity bearing a significant relationship to a traditional maritime activity.
Dunaway v. Louisiana Wildlife & Fisheries Commission 6 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Trinh Ex Rel. Tran v. Dufrene Boats, Inc. 6 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The United States Constitution grants to federal district courts jurisdiction in all “cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction.” U.S. Const, art. Ill, section 2; Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Price v. Tenneco Oil Co. 996 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Helicopters, Inc., ), that "application of state law [to the plaintiffs' claims] would not impermissibly interfere with any required uniformity of general maritime law."
Curtis Price v. Tenneco Oil Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Helicopters, Inc., ), that “application of state law [to the plaintiffs’ claims] would not impermissibly interfere with any required uniformity of general maritime law.” 5 441 (La.1975)).
Dahiya v. Talmidge Intern. Ltd. 931 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
10 (La.1/19/06), , citing Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Coutee v. Global Marine Drilling Co. 924 So. 2d 112 La. 2006
524 , 61 L.Ed.2d 1086 (1917)); (citing Powell v. Offshore Navigation, Inc., 644 F.2d 1063 , 1065 n. 5 (5th Cir.1981)).
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp. 921 So. 2d 58 La. 2006
is governed by the same principles as govern actions brought in admiralty, i.e., by federal maritime law.'" Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp. 886 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
[3] Furthermore, in Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court found that the *1287 general maritime law authorized the application of state law as a supplement to the general maritime law unless there is some federal impediment to the application of that law in federal legislation or a clearly applicable rule in the general maritime law.
Brian T. Shields, Et Ux v. Baker Hughes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Still, in Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Shields v. Baker Hughes, Inc. 866 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Still, in Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Fishbones, Inc. v. Southern Boat Service of La., Inc. 849 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Citing Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., Fishbones argues “a Louisiana court should respect Louisiana law unless there is some federal impediment to application of that law contained in federal legislation or a clearly applicable rule in the general maritime law.” Id.
Shofstahl v. BD. OF COM'RS OF ORLEANS LEVEE 841 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Plaintiffs cite Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., (La.
Shofstahl v. Board of Commissioners 841 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Plaintiffs cite Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., to argue that state tort law should govern this case.
Wall v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 833 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
LAW AND DISCUSSION Admiralty Jurisdiction In Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., -37 (La.1992), the supreme court stated: Generally, federal maritime jurisdiction is invoked whenever an accident occurs on the high seas and in furtherance of an activity bearing a significant relationship to a traditional maritime activity.
Warren v. Sabine Towing and Transp. Co. 831 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Bertrand v. Air Logistics, Inc. 820 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Allison relies on Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., for its position.
Winkler v. Coastal Towing, LLC 823 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Terre Aux Borufs Land v. JR Gray Barge 803 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Lyons v. Pool Co. of Texas 781 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Saucier v. Players Lake Charles, LLC 751 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
The supreme court in Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Parker v. Southwestern Offshore Corp. 763 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Foster v. Destin Trading Corp., 96-0803 (La.5/30/97), ; Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., reh’g denied, cert.
Dragon v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring 726 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Day v. Touchard, Inc. 712 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
See: In Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., (La.
Gibbs v. Falcon Drilling Co. 713 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Lejano v. Bandak 705 So. 2d 158 La. 1998
Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc.
Coto v. J. RAY McDERMOTT, SA 709 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc.
Parks v. Pine Bluff Sand & Gravel Co. 712 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
See Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc. cert.
Brodtmann v. Duke 708 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
In Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Thibodaux v. Southern Natural Gas Co. 705 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Columbia relies, in part, on Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., , (La.1992); however, it is clear (and Columbia readily admits) that federal maritime law governs the interpretation of a contract for charter of a vessel.
Foster v. Destin Trading Corp. 700 So. 2d 199 La. 1997
Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., rehearing denied, certiorari denied, 506 U.S. 819 , 113 S.Ct.
Futch v. Attwood 698 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
4 Cir.1980), followed by Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., n. 11 (La.1992); Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., (La.App.
Zeller v. Olympic Marine Co. 692 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
In Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., our Supreme Court held that the federal admiralty law scheme authorized the application of state law in a state court admiralty case when the state’s interest in the matter is greater than the federal interest in uniformity.
Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc. 676 So. 2d 89 La. 1996
1086 (1917); citing Powell v. Offshore Navigation, Inc., 644 F.2d 1063 , 1065 n. 5 (5th Cir.1981).
Cross v. Cutter Biological, Div. of Miles Inc. 676 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
overruled on other grounds, Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc.
Smith v. Gretna MacH. and Iron Works 646 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
See also Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., (the "twilight zone" underlies the "maritime but local" doctrine allowing concurrent jurisdiction).
Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp. 639 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
In Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Higgins v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 627 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Higgins v. STATE, THROUGH DOTD 627 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Fox v. Southern Scrap Export Co., Ltd. 618 So. 2d 844 La. 1993
1590 , 36 L.Ed.2d 280 (1973); Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc.
Moss v. Dixie MacH., Welding & Metal Works, Inc. 617 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
[1] See also Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Armstrong v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co. 609 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
See, Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., (La.