Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rs, 591 So. 2d 342.

1145 citing documents.

Fowler v. T.L. James & Co. 621 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
McNeer Elec. Contracting, Inc. v. CRL, INC. 621 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Taylor v. Smith 619 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
The jurisprudence regarding this court's review in an appeal from a grant of a as follows: Appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court's consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Smith v. Exxon Chemical Americas 619 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
With regard to the standard of review to be applied by this court, recently noted that appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court's consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co. 619 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
at 345 (La., 1991): Appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court's consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate....
Dibos v. Bill Watson Ford, Inc. 622 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
LaFleur v. City of New Orleans 619 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Williams v. City of New Orleans 621 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Whetstone v. Dixon 616 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
[8] the prevailing meaning of the term "borrow" in the context of automobile lending requires that the borrower acquire substantial possession, dominion, control, or the right to direct the use of the vehicle, and not merely that the use of the vehicle by another person was for the benefit of a purported b
White v. Noble & Associates 618 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Kantack v. Progressive Ins. Co. 618 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Cantrelle v. State Farm General Insurance Co. 618 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Richoux v. Tulane Medical Center 617 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Higbee v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 617 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Duncan v. Balcor Property Management, Inc. 615 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
With regard to the standard of review to be applied by this court, recently noted that appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Duncan v. Balcor Property Management, Inc. 615 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
With regard to the standard of review to be applied by this court, recently noted that appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court's consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Ledet v. QUALITY SHOPYARDS, INC. 615 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Self v. Walker Oldsmobile Co., Inc. 614 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Whitney National Bank v. Buchler 615 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Mosley v. Dairyland Ins. Co. 614 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Potter v. FIRST FEDERAL S & L ASS'N OF SCOTLANDVILLE 615 So. 2d 318 La. 1993
Armstrong v. Hanover Ins. Co. 614 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Pizzalato v. Traina 614 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Zaffuto v. Champion Insurance Co. 613 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
A Confidential Limousine Service, Inc. v. London Livery, Ltd. 612 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc. 612 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
With regard to the standard of review to be applied by this court, recently noted that appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court's consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Prado v. Sloman Neptun Schiffahrts, AG 611 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
1 Cir.), reversed on other grounds, (La.App.
Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co. 609 So. 2d 195 La. 1992
Mix v. University of New Orleans 609 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
1 Cir.), reversed on other grounds, Eads Operating Co., (La.App.
Strickland v. State Farm Ins. Companies 607 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Scott v. Pack 607 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Singletary v. Crown Zellerbach 607 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Young v. Oberhelman 607 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Galata v. Turner 602 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Schroeder v. Board of Sup’rs of Louisiana State University
Transworld Drilling Co. v. Texas Gen. Res., Inc. 604 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Luckette v. Bart's on the Lake, Ltd. 602 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Davis v. Brock 602 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Tolis v. BOARD OF SUP'RS, STATE UNIVERSITY 602 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Brown v. Diversified Hospitality Group, Inc. 600 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Reeb v. Kern 599 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
of Supervisors of Louisiana State University
Roadrunner Motor Rebuilders, Inc. v. Ryan 603 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
1st Cir.), reversed on other grounds, Eads Operating Company, (La.App.
Gravolet v. Board of Com'rs 598 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Davis v. St. Charles General Hosp. 598 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Hartford Acc. & Indem. v. Illinois Cent. 598 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Jones v. United States Fidelity 596 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992