Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., 593 So. 2d 351.

104 citing documents.

Edwards v. Alexander 960 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
LaCombe v. Bank One Corp. 953 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., see also, Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp., 255 La.
Dr. Rick Lacombe v. Bank One Corp. D/B/A Bank One La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., 19 see also, Plaquemines Parish Com'n 20 Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., 21 (La.1987); Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp., 255 La.
Atlas Iron and Metal Company v. D. Warren Ashy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Academy Mortgage cited Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., which concluded that “there is no requirement that the quantum of damages be certain or that they be fully incurred, or incurred in some particular quantum, before the plaintiff has a right of action.” The same is true regarding the existence of a cause of action in legal malpractice.
Atlas Iron and Metal Co. v. Ashy 918 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Academy Mortgage cited Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., which concluded that "there is no requirement that the quantum of damages be certain or that they be fully incurred, or incurred in some particular quantum, before the plaintiff has a right of action."
Babineaux v. DOTD 927 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Carter, 892 So.2d at 1268 ; Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., (La.
In Re Noe 916 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
In re Medical Review Proceeding of Sitzman 904 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Martinez Management, Inc. v. Caston 900 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Alexander v. Fulco 895 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Bailey v. Khoury 891 So. 2d 1268 La. 2005
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., (citations omitted).
Carter v. Haygood 892 So. 2d 1261 La. 2005
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., see also, Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp., 255 La.
Jamie Hebert v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Hebert v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 884 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Thornton v. City of Shreveport 865 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., Martin v. Comm-Care Corp., 37,600 (La.App.2d Cir.10/16/03), .
Martin v. Comm-Care Corp. 859 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Hughes v. Olin Corp. 856 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Ls Huckabay, Md Memorial Hosp. v. Kpmg 843 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
In support of its argument that the Hospital's action is prescribed, KPMG places much emphasis on Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., which involved a suit against an accountant and a vendor for misstating a company's tax liability.
Hazelwood Farm, Inc. v. Liberty Oil and Gas Corp. 844 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. 824 So. 2d 1137 La. 2002
Williams v. Holiday Inn Worldwide 816 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
1993) ], supra; Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
Stett v. Greve 810 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., (La.
Grunblatt v. Beevers 806 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Orthopaedic Clinic of Monroe v. Ruhl 786 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
art. 3492; Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Huffman v. Goodman 784 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Podnuh's also cites the supreme court case of Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., for the proposition that a plaintiff cannot know or reasonably be expected to know of an act, omission or neglect that begins the running of prescription until he has suffered "appreciable damage."
Smith v. Cutter Biological 770 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
See Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., Steele v. Steele, 98-693 (La.App.
Hendrick v. ABC Ins. Co. 760 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc. and Touche Ross & Co., Plaquemines Parish Comm'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc., Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp., 255 La.
ACADEMY MORTG. CO., LLC v. Juarez 740 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Touchet v. Baker Hughes Inc. 737 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
1993); See also Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Bopp Salon Services, Inc. v. Carraway 714 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Likewise, in Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., the supreme court held that prescription began to run when the plaintiff incurred substantial accountant’s and attorney’s fees in investigating and informing himself of deficiencies in a tax return, and it was not necessary that complete damages be ascertained or that formal proceedings be initiated against
Carter v. Schott 707 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
The supreme court explained in Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., (La.
K & M ENTERPRISES v. Richland Equipment Co. 700 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
art. 3492; Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., Jason v. Brown, 92-1301, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
Cameron Parish School Bd. v. Acands, Inc. 687 So. 2d 84 La. 1997
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
State Ex Rel. Ieyoub v. Bordens, Inc. 684 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Marsh Engineering, Inc. v. Parker 688 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
[5] Further, the Louisiana Supreme Court in Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., (La.
Brumfield v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 674 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Mier v. Giles Lafayette, Inc. 670 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
3 Cir.1992); Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
National Council on Compensation Ins. v. QUIXX TEMPORARY SERVICES INC. 665 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Wright v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 662 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
See and compare Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., McClelland v. Jarrell's, Inc., writ denied; and Gulf States Land & Dev.
Doe v. Doe 671 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., (La.
Hampton v. Kroger Co. 658 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Boyd v. BBC Brown Boveri, Inc. 656 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Doe v. Roman Catholic Church 656 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Bouterie v. Crane, supra ; Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
Labbe Serv. Garage Inc. v. LBM Distributors, Inc. 650 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Adams v. First Nat. Bank of Commerce 644 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., "Thus in cases *224 in which a plaintiff has suffered some but not all of his damages, prescription runs from the date on which he first suffered actual and appreciable damage."
Jason v. Brown 637 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
art. 3492; Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Wimberly v. Gatch 635 So. 2d 206 La. 1994
Bouterie v. Crane, supra ; Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. Delta Development Co., Inc.
Lirette v. Roe 631 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Co., Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., (La.App.
Fontaine v. Roman Catholic Church 625 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Bouterie v. Crane 616 So. 2d 657 La. 1993
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., citing Baudry-Lacantinerie & Tissier, Prescription, 5 Civil Law Transl.