Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc., 593 So. 2d 357.
- Hammond v. Zachry 629 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Kelley v. Louisiana Limestone Aggregates, Inc. 630 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Batten v. Travelers Insurance Co. 628 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
LaPrarie v. Pony Exp. Courier
628 So. 2d 192
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Miles v. FD Shay Contractor, Inc.
626 So. 2d 74
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
The Louisiana Supreme Court stated clearly in Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., that the governing law in a workers' compensation action is that which was in effect at the time of the alleged injury.
-
Weeks v. TL James & Co. Inc.
626 So. 2d 420
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Masters v. Scogin Auto Parts, Inc.
625 So. 2d 319
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Richard v. Temple-Inland
625 So. 2d 335
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
We conclude that the hearing officer failed to follow the legal principles governing the required proof in such circumstances as laid down in West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., and Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Coley v. Wilson Oil Co., Inc.
620 So. 2d 445
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Robinson v. Travelers Ins. Co.
619 So. 2d 1261
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Bruno v. Harbert Intern., Inc., (La.
-
Esthay v. Manpower
627 So. 2d 182
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Inc., articulated the burden of proof and standard of review in worker’s compensation cases: “Despite the liberal construction of the statute afforded the worker in a compensation action, the worker’s burden of proof is not relaxed.
- Broussard v. Domingue 619 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-
Jenkins v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV.
619 So. 2d 1188
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Smith v. Exxon Chemical Americas
619 So. 2d 140
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
23:1021(1); Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc., (La.
- Cross v. Travelers Ins. Co. 619 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
-
Martin v. Riverview Medical Center
618 So. 2d 1014
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Ryland v. Liberty Lloyds Ins. Co.
617 So. 2d 583
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., (La.
- Wilson v. Roberts' Gumbo Shop, Inc. 617 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
Vincent v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.
615 So. 2d 47
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., the Supreme Court recently summarized the jurisprudence concerning proof of a work related accident: Louisiana courts consistently have interpreted the work-related accident requirement liberally.
- Cockerham v. Atlantic Richfield Co. 615 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-
Shelton v. Wall
614 So. 2d 828
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc.
-
Healy v. National RR Corp.(Amtrak)
613 So. 2d 1117
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Rosell v. ESCO, supra; Bruno v. Harbert Intern, Inc., (La.
- Carter v. Winn Dixie, Louisiana, Inc. 613 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
Jessen v. Dr. Kenneth W. Wimberly, DDS
610 So. 2d 252
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
1987); Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
- Guggenheim v. Parish of Jefferson 613 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
Smith v. UNR Home Products
607 So. 2d 898
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., (La.
-
Key v. Insurance Co. of North America
605 So. 2d 675
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., Nelson v. Roadway Exp., Inc.
-
Jasmin v. St. James Parish School Bd.
606 So. 2d 15
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., (La.App.
- Collier v. Schega 601 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Weaver v. Harmony Construction Co. 602 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
Roszell v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.
602 So. 2d 87
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Inc., and reinstated the trial court's findings of an accident.
-
Finley v. State Farm Ins. Co.
598 So. 2d 537
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
(Footnotes omitted; citations omitted) See also, Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Louviere v. Mills
595 So. 2d 1224
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., (La.
-
Beaudoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.
594 So. 2d 1049
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., et al, No. 91-C-1444 on the docket of the Louisiana Supreme Court.