Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dixon v. Hughes, 587 So. 2d 679.

45 citing documents.

Karen Dickerson Versus Derrick Shepherd and Jon Gegenheimer, in His Official Capacity as Clerk of Court for the … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Charles A. Gibson, Sr. Versus Byron L. Lee and Hon. Jon A. Gegenehimer, Jefferson Parish Clerk of Court La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Gwen Fontenot and Renee M. Brown v. Todd P. McKellar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
See Becker v. Dean, 03–2493, p. 7 (La.9/18/03), Russell v. Goldsby, 00–2595, p. 4 (La.9/22/00)
Yasha Clark & Morgan Walker v. Stephanie Bridges and Darren Lombard, in His Official Capacity as Clerk of … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Al Perry Thomas v. Neal Lartigue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
See Becker v. Dean, 03-2493, p. 7 (La.9/18/03), Russell v. Goldsby, 00-2595, p. 4 (La.9/22/00)
Veronica Braggs Versus Simeon Dickerson and Jon A. Gegenheimer, Jefferson Parish Clerk of Court La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Karen Schindler v. Derek T. Russ and the Honorable Darren Lombard La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Nathaniel Roy Williams v. George Harrison La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Loretta Brehm Versus John ("johnny") I. Shaddinger, Jr. and Jon Gegenheimer, in His Official Capacity as Clerk of … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Clerk of Court For the Court Allison Nocito v. Kendall Bussey, Sr. And Jon Gegenheimer, In His Official … La. 2020
Leslie A. Ellison v. Winston Melvin Whitten, Jr. and the Honorable Arthur A. Morrell, in His Official Capacity … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Susan E. Percle Versus Leloashia Harmon Taylor and Jon Gegenheimer, in His Official Capacity as Clerk of Court … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
9/18/03), Russell, 780 So.2d at 1051; (La.
Allison Nocito Versus Kendall Bussey, Sr. and Jon Gegenheimer, in His Official Capacity as Clerk of Court for … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Raymond J. Labat, Jr. Versus Melinda Price-Bedi, Kyle Ardoin, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of State for … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
Smith v. Warren 253 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Petit v. Ducote 253 So. 3d 252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
North v. Doucet 253 So. 3d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Trosclair v. Joseph 150 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
Trosclair v. Becnel 150 So. 3d 324 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
Cleveland v. Williams 148 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Morton v. Hicks 74 So. 3d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See Becker v. Dean, 03-2493, p. 7 (La.9/18/03), ; Russell v. Goldsby, 00-2595, p. 4 (La.9/22/00)
Distinguished Scaglione v. Juneau 45 So. 3d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Then-Justice Kimball in her concurring opinion further explained the uniqueness of Landiak by contrasting it with the Supreme Court’s : *198 While the Dixon case involved almost identical evidence regarding the candidate’s domicile, I believe it is distinguishable because the notice of candidacy form at issue in that case was not filed within the relevant one year period.
Matassa v. Jasmine 42 So. 3d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Williams v. Fahrenholtz 990 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See Becker v. Dean, 03-2493, p. 7 (La.9/18/03), ; Russell v. Goldsby, 00-2595, p. 4 (La.9/22/00), ; ...
Robichaux v. Shields 991 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Russell v. Goldsby, 00-2595, p. 4 (La.9/22/00)
Louisiana State Bd. of Ethics v. Garrett 929 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Landiak v. Richmond, 05-0758 (La.3/24/05), ; Becker v. Dean, 03-2493 (La.9/18/03), ; Russell v. Goldsby, 00-2595 (La.9/22/00); (La.
Landiak v. Richmond 899 So. 2d 535 La. 2005
The court of appeal then applied the relevant case law, and Cade v. Lombard, 99-0184 (La.App.
Landiak v. Richmond 900 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
18:492; Russell v. Goldsby, 2000-2595 (La.9/22/00)
Justin Conner v. Gene T. Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Conner v. Allen 872 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Becker v. Dean 854 So. 2d 864 La. 2003
18:492, Russell v. Goldsby, 00-2595 (La.9/22/00)
Dominique v. Favorite 854 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Becker v. Dean 852 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Norris v. Gould 854 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Rosamond v. Alexander 846 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Knott v. Angelle 846 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Russell v. Goldsby 780 So. 2d 1048 La. 2000
Steinhardt v. Batt 753 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
*933 680 (La.1991); Cade v. Lombard, 99-0184, 99-0185 (La.App.
Hammett v. Knight 744 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5 Cir.1991); and that the person objecting to the candidacy bears the burden of proving the candidate is disqualified.
Cade v. Lombard 727 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Pattan v. Fields 661 So. 2d 1320 La. 1995
Butler v. Cantrell 630 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Arnold v. Hughes 621 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Elie v. Karst 594 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Rather, I would adhere to that well-established practice of interpreting laws governing the conduct of elections liberally “so as to promote rather than defeat candidacy.” (La.App.
Dixon v. Hughes 588 So. 2d 1101 La. 1991