DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite STATE, DOTD v. Williamson, 597 So. 2d 439.

182 citing documents.

  • Peyton Place, Condominium Associates, Inc. v. Guastella 18 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Tate and April Vander v. Safeway Ins. Co. of La. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Vander v. Safeway Ins. Co. of La. 5 So. 3d 968 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Square Deal Siding Co. v. Thaller 3 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Osborne v. McKenzie 998 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williamson, 91-2401 (La.4/20/92), .
  • Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel 990 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 988 So. 2d 186 La. 2008
    E.g., Rivet v. State, 96-0145 (La.9/5/96), ; State, (La.
  • White v. St. Elizabeth BC Bd. of Directors 986 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • Singletary v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 982 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    The supreme court addressed the issue of "reasonableness" in State, Department of Transportation & (footnote omitted): Factors to be taken into consideration in determining the reasonableness of attorney fees include: (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) amount of money involved; (5) extent and character of the work performed; (6)
  • Keith Singletary v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    The supreme court addressed the issue of “reasonableness” in State, Department of Transportation & (footnote omitted): Factors to be taken into consideration in determining the reasonableness of attorney fees include: (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) amount of money involved; (5) extent and character o
  • State, Dept. of Tran. and Dev. v. Res. Par. 985 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Restructure Partners, L.L.C. 985 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State, DOTD v. McKeithen 976 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    48:453 E; State v. Williamson, 91-2401 (La.4/20/92), .
  • SDS, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 978 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    and Devel *1018 (1) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (2) lathe likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer; (3) the f
  • Woodall v. Weaver 975 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • French Market Foods of La, Inc. v. Atterberry Idealease, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Smith v. ACADIANA MORTG. OF LOUISIANA, INC. 975 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • French Market Foods v. Atterberry Idealease 975 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Clk Company, LLC v. Cxy Energy, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    We have considered the factors enumerated in State, Department of Transportation & (La.1992), for determining reasonable attorney’s fees and find CLK’s request reasonable as counsel 17 has successfully protected a judgment in excess of $1.5 million, counsel’s work has been exemplary and reveals that its legal knowledge and skill are extensive and tha
  • CLK COMPANY, LLC v. CXY Energy, Inc. 972 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    *1292 We have considered the factors enumerated in State, Department of Transportation & , (La.1992), for determining reasonable attorney's fees and find CLK's request reasonable as counsel has successfully protected a judgment in excess of $1.5 million, counsel's work has been exemplary and reveals that its legal knowledge and skill are extensive and that its preparation of the appeal has been significan
  • Porter v. Pellerin Construction Co. 958 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Dixie Services v. R & B Falcon Drilling USA 955 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • Hymel v. HMO of Louisiana, Inc. 951 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    [23] See generally State, DOTD v. Williamson, State, providing that the factors to be taken into consideration in determining the reasonableness of attorney fees include: (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) the amount of money involved; (5) the extent and character of the work perfo
  • Robert Neil Guilbeau v. Bayou Chateau Nursing Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In State, this court set forth those factors to be taken into consideration in determining the reasonableness of attorney fees as follows: (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) t
  • Guilbeau v. Bayou Chateau Nursing Center 930 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In State, this court set forth those factors to be taken into consideration in determining the reasonableness of attorney fees as follows: (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) the amount of money involved; (5) the extent and character of the
  • Norfleet v. LIFEGUARD TRANSP. SERVICE, INC. 934 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • Roccaforte v. Nintendo of America, Inc. 917 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • Joseph Matt v. Agro Distribution, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Defendants would suggest a total reasonable attorney fee in the range of $30,000-$50,000.” In State, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of attorney’s fees include: 8 (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) a
  • Matt v. Agro Distribution, LLC 904 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In State, the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of attorney's fees include: (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) amount of money involved; (5) extent and character of the work p
  • Smith v. State 899 So. 2d 516 La. 2005
    13:5111(A) and those factors set forth by this court in State, the district court found the attorney fees requested by Smith to be reasonable and awarded fees to Smith in the amount of $78,428.00.
  • Thompson v. Emmis Television Broadcasting 894 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    4 Cir. 12/27/01), , where this Court, quoting State, -442 (La.1992), stated that "[r]egardless of the language of the statutory authorization for an award of attorney fees or the method employed by a trial court in making an award of attorney fees, courts may inquire as to the reasonableness of attorney fees as part of their prevailing, inherent authority to regulat
  • Acadian Gas Pipeline System v. Bourgeois 890 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
  • Billiot v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 897 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • Cathy Darden v. R. Craig Smith and the Ferriday Villa Partnership La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In that case, notably, the fourth circuit referenced State, for the proposition that the courts may consider the reasonableness of attorney’s fees even in the face of statutory language authorizing their assessment.
  • Darden v. Smith 879 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In that case, notably, the fourth circuit referenced State, (La.
  • Smith v. State Department of Transportation & Development 872 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In State, -42 (La.1992) the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the factors to be considered in reviewing an award of attorney fees: Courts may inquire as to the reasonableness of attorney fees as part of their prevailing, inherent authority to regulate the practice of law....
  • Smith v. STATE, DEP. OF TRANS. & DEVELOP. 872 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In State, -42 (La.1992) the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the factors to be considered in reviewing an award of attorney fees: Courts may inquire as to the reasonableness of attorney fees as part of their prevailing, inherent authority to regulate the practice of law....
  • Ken Smith D/B/A B & K Music v. State of Louisiana, Dept. of Transportation & Develop. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In State, -42 (La.1992) the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the factors to be considered in reviewing an award of attorney fees: Courts may inquire as to the reasonableness of attorney fees as part of their prevailing, inherent authority to regulate the practice of law .
  • State v. St. Charles Airline Lands, Inc. 871 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State, DOTD v. Williamson, 91-2401, 91-2404 (La.4/20/92), .
  • Corbello v. Iowa Production 850 So. 2d 686 La. 2003
    In so finding, the court of appeal considered the factors identified in State, -42 (La.1992) to be considered by a court in reviewing an award of attorney fees: Factors to be taken into consideration in determining the reasonableness of attorney fees include: (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) amount of money involved
  • Yuspeh v. Koch 840 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
  • In Re Succession of Bankston 844 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Broussard 834 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Rivet v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 825 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Brown v. Catalyst Recovery of Louisiana, Inc. 813 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • Stern v. Doe 806 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • Corbello v. Iowa Production 806 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    The supreme court in State, -42 (La.1992) (citations omitted) (footnote omitted) set out the factors to be considered by a court in reviewing an award of attorney fees: Courts may inquire as to the reasonableness of attorney fees as part of their prevailing, inherent authority to regulate the practice of law....
  • Rivet v. STATE, DOTD 800 So. 2d 777 La. 2001
    Based on this testimony, and citing the factors set forth in State, [3] DOTD argued the minimum possible attorney's fee award was $118,750 and the maximum was $350,000.
  • Vignette Publications, Inc. v. Harborview Enterprises, Inc. 799 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    -442 (La.1992), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Courts may inquire as to the reasonableness of attorney fees as part of their prevailing, inherent authority to regulate the practice of law.
  • City of Shreveport v. Chanse Gas Corp. 794 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001