Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite STATE, DOTD v. Williamson, 597 So. 2d 439.

182 citing documents.

Smith v. Roussel 808 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
2nd Cir.1991), affirmed in part as amended and reversed in part on other grounds
Short v. Plantation Management Corp. 781 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
L & a CONTRACTING v. Ram Indus. Coatings, Inc. 762 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Natchitoches Parish Port Commission v. Deblieux & Kelley, Inc. 760 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Custom-Bilt Cabinet v. Quality Built Cab. 748 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Franklin Southland Printing v. Noab 739 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State, -42 (La.1992) and cases cited therein.
National Information Services v. Gottsegen 737 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Edmundson Bros. v. Montex Drilling Co. 731 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
-42 (La.1992) (footnote omitted) discussed the factors to be considered by a court in reviewing an award of attorney's fees: Courts may inquire as to the reasonableness of attorney fees as part of their prevailing, inherent authority to regulate the practice of law.
Maggio v. Robinson 741 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Gross v. Maison Blanche, Inc. 732 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Hirsch v. Cahn Elec. Co., Inc. 694 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Stone 692 So. 2d 1241 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
As authority, DOTD cites State, and Rivet v. State, DOTD
Theriot v. Bourg 691 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Adams v. FRANCHISE FINANCE CORP. 689 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Helena Chemical Co. v. Nichols 695 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
See State, DOTD *995 v. Williamson
Rivet v. State, Dept. of Trans. and Dev. 680 So. 2d 1154 La. 1996
Ardoin v. State, Dept. of Transp. 679 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Gravolet v. BD. OF COM'RS. 676 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
441 442 (La.1992), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Courts may inquire as to the reasonableness of attorney fees as part of their prevailing, inherent authority to regulate the practice of law.
STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Scramuzza 673 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
The Supreme Court in State, said: "Attorney fees in expropriation cases are discretionary with the trial court.
Town of Jonesville v. Griffing 670 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The Town of Jonesville cites State, Dept, (La.App.
In Re Tutor. of Property of Huddleston 655 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Steptore v. Masco Const. Co., Inc. 643 So. 2d 1213 La. 1994
State, McDill v. Utica Mut.
Gordon v. Levet 643 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
West Jefferson Levee D. v. Coast Quality 640 So. 2d 1258 La. 1994
In State, this court listed the following factors as those to be taken into consideration in an expropriation case when determining the reasonableness of attorney's fees: (1) the ultimate result obtained; (2) the responsibility incurred; (3) the importance of the litigation; (4) amount of money involved; (5) extent a
Souhlas v. Orlando 629 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Despite attorney fee contracts “[C]ourts may inquire as to the reasonableness of attorney fees as part of their prevailing, inherent authority to regulate the practice of law.” State, -442 (La.1992).
Mitchell v. Fradella 628 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Fontenot v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 625 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State, Department *1125 (La.
Durham Life Ins. Co. v. Lee 625 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
" Moody v. Arabie, 498 So.2d at 1086 (La.1986) (emphasis added); State, , 443 n. 10 (La.1992).
Miller & Miller v. Home Insurance Co. 625 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Simmons v. BOARD OF COM'RS, BOSSIER LEVEE DISTRICT 624 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
See also and compare the "reasonableness" analysis in State, and Mini Togs Products, (La.App.
West Jefferson Levee Dist. v. Coast Quality Const. Corp. 620 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
38:387(E); State, State, Dept. of Transp.
Interdiction of F.T.E. 622 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993