Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Spott v. Otis Elevator Co., 601 So. 2d 1355.

182 citing documents.

Morris & Dickson Co. v. Jones Brothers Co., Inc. 691 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Thomas v. Medical Center of Southwest Louisiana 685 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
*713 the supreme court stated: Res ipsa loquitur, as “a qualification of the general rule that negligence is not to be presumed,” must be sparingly applied.
Gray v. Economy Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 682 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Alco Collections, Inc. v. Poirier 680 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Coleman v. Fisher Lumber Corp. 677 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
art. 928; Simmons v. Hope Contractors, Inc., (La.App.
Dorthlon v. ST. FRANCIS MED. CENTER 677 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Fletcher v. Fenoli 674 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Phillip v. Home Ins. Co. 671 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Falco Lime, Inc. v. PLAQUEMINE CONTRACTING CO. 672 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Benton v. Board of Commissioners for the East Jefferson Levee District 672 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
However, once it is evident on the face of the pleadings that prescription has indeed run, the opposing party then has the burden of showing that the prescriptive period has been interrupted or |4suspended, or never commenced to run
Mier v. Giles Lafayette, Inc. 670 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Tramontin v. Glass 668 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
This doctrine was most recently discussed in Spott v. Otis Elevator Co. as follows: Res ipsa loquitur, as "a qualification of the general rule that negligence is not to be presumed," must be sparingly applied.
Rivard v. Petroleum Transport Co., Inc. 663 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Ortego v. Jefferson Davis Parish School Bd. 657 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Rabito v. Otis Elevator Co. 648 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
McBride v. Cracker Barrel Stores, Inc. 649 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Francis v. American Well Service & Drilling, Inc., (La.App.
Ledet v. Montgomery Elevator Co. 644 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
A. Negligence Although the Supreme Court has never ruled directly on the issue, (La.
Townsend v. Westinghouse Elevator Corporation 641 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Buffinet v. Plaquemines Parish Com'n 645 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Pineda v. Ruppel 639 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Cochren v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 639 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
: "Because Otis was ultimately found not liable, which result we affirm, the plaintiff cannot rely on La.Civ.Code art. 3503 nor on La.Civ.Code art. 2324(C).
Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. AMI-Electrical & Hoist Service 637 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Fontenot v. Fontenot 635 So. 2d 219 La. 1994
-62 (La.1992) (citing Fox, 576 So.2d at 981 ).
Rabito v. Otis Elevator Co. 633 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Guilfore v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd. 631 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
O'Boyle v. Promersberger 625 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Jolly v. Otis Elevator Co. 620 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
With regard to the garde issue
Graham v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 619 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
See also, at 1359, n. 10 (La.1992).
Francis v. American Well Serv. & Drilling, Inc. 617 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Jones v. McDonald's Corporation 618 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Lantier v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 614 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Smith v. State Through Dept. of Public Safety 620 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992