Rodrigue v. Rodrigue
Rodrigue v. Rodrigue, 591 So. 2d 1171 (La. 1992).
Cited by
- Louisiana-Annunciation Condominium Association, Inc. v. Kathryn L. Kennedy La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
- Martin C. Willrige, III. v. Letitia B. Willrige La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- Jamie LaBranche v. Louisiana Department of Justice AG Jeff Landry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
- Drake Landry v. Tabitha Landry La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
- Gerald J. Calogero v. USA Agencies Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
- Lingo v. Lingo 249 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
- Devereux v. Atkins 224 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
- Rodgers v. Rodgers 170 So. 3d 382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
- First Bank & Trust v. Simmons 165 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2015
- Jackson v. Pfeifer 156 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- Clark v. Department of Police 155 So. 3d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- Byrd v. Department of Police 109 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Rodrigue v. Rodrigue 588 So. 2d 1180
- Trahan v. Petroleum Casualty Co. 250 La. 949
- Trahan v. Petroleum Casualty Company 200 So. 2d 6
Opinion text
591 So.2d 1171 (1992) Reynold J. RODRIGUE v. Elodie Lecompte RODRIGUE No. 91-C-2651. Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 10, 1992. PER CURIAM. Plaintiff's writ application is granted. The judgment of the court of appeal holding that Local Rule 22 of the Rules of the Thirty-Second Judicial District Court is not in conflict with the provisions of Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 1312 is hereby reversed. 588 So.2d 1180 . The requirements of delivery or mailing of all pleadings under Local Rule 22 constitutes service under Code of Civil Procedure article 1313. Article 1312 specifically exempts any pleading not required by law to be in writing from service. Code of Civil Procedure article 1701 provides that preliminary defaults may be obtained by oral motion in open court or by written motion. Since local rules of court cannot conflict with legislation, see Trahan v. Petroleum Cas. Co., 250 La. 949 , 200 So.2d 6 (1967), Local Rule 22 of the Thirty-Second Judicial District Court is hereby declared null and *1172 void to the extent it conflicts with Code of Civil Procedure article 1312. The judgment of default entered by the trial court is hereby reinstated.