Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., 616 So. 2d 1234.

559 citing documents.

Stevenson v. Lavalco, Inc. 669 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
Ansalve v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 669 So. 2d 1328 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
See, e.g., Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Poy v. Twin Oaks Nursing Home, Inc. 671 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
We agree with this holding, especially in light of Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
Franks v. Air Conditioning Appliance Corp. 670 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Walls v. State 670 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
McINNIS BROS. CONSTR., INC. v. PEOPLES WATER SERVICE CO. 666 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Art. 421; Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Edwards v. Daugherty 670 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
[1] Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
SLEM, Inc. v. Poker Games, Inc. 666 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Price v. Secretary, Department of Revenue & Taxation 664 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Martin v. Bigner 665 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Webb Const., Inc. v. City of Shreveport 665 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Stovall v. Carimi 667 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Horil v. Scheinhorn 663 So. 2d 697 La. 1995
See Everything *702 on Wheels Subaru
EVANS VENDING SERVICE, INC. v. Raymond 666 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
NOTES [1] In their memorandum in support of the motion, defendants stated that they were "precluded from filing a Peremptory Exception of No Cause of Action [because] the Petition states two causes of action arising out of a single incident, only one of which is subject to censure," citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
Lybrand v. Newman 663 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru [South], Inc., et al., (La.App.
Elliott v. District Attorney of Baton Rouge 664 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Therefore, if indeed the claim for civil penalties is a separate cause of action under Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Elliott has failed to state a cause of action for civil penalties.
Craft v. Allstate Ins. Co. 663 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru
Lawson v. Straus 660 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Guilbeaux v. Times of Acadiana, Inc. 661 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
Cage v. Adoption Options of La., Inc. 657 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Norwood v. Craig 658 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Porche v. Continental Ins. Co. 655 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Tigator, Inc. v. W. BATON ROUGE POLICE JURY 657 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Morris v. Maryland Cas. Co. 657 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
CENLA PHYSICAL THERAPY & REHAB. AGENCY INC. v. Lavergne 657 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Cenla, 651 So.2d at 462 .
Bodden v. Zapata Gulf Marine Corp. 653 So. 2d 581 La. 1995
App. 4th Cir. 9/21/94), ; see Everything on Wheels Subaru
Sattar v. Royal Sonesta, Inc. 654 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels v. Subaru South, Inc.
Becnel v. United Gas Pipeline Co. 655 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Additionally, : The function of an exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.
In Re Tutor. of Property of Huddleston 655 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Leenert's Farms, abrogated on other grounds by Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.
Clay v. Papillion 653 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
art. 927(4); Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Kyles v. Sylvester 654 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Horil v. Scheinhorn 653 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru, (La.App.
Southland Truck Center, Inc. v. Bank of Sunset & Trust Co. 651 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Cenla Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Agency v. Lavergne 651 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Pasqua v. St. Landry Parish Police Jury 651 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
art. 927(4); Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Scamardo v. Dunaway 650 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., et al., (La.App.
Prudential Ins. v. CC & F BATON ROUGE 647 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
Zar v. Gaudet 648 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Bertucci v. McIntire 648 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
In Caire , a panel of this Court discussed the appealability of partial judgments and, quoting Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., stated: Article 1915 was designed to limit to the enumerated situations a court's authority to render a partial final judgment which is appealable.
Wagoner v. Dyson 647 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Goodwin v. Agrilite of Louisiana 643 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Everything on Wheels Subaru v. Subaru South, Inc.
Pape v. Odeco, Inc. 643 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Dufour v. Westlawn Cemeteries, Inc. 639 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South Inc., et al., (La.
Sledge v. Continental Cas. Co. 639 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Ellis v. Normal Life of Louisiana 638 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Under Everything on Wheels v. Subaru South, Inc., , (La.1993), this judgment is not a partial final judgment which is appealable, but is an interlocutory judgment with no showing of irreparable injury.
Adams v. Deaton, Inc. 637 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Everything on Wheels, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Montalvo v. Sondes 637 So. 2d 127 La. 1994
Everything on Wheels Subaru
Benoit v. Louisiana Water Co. 640 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Harrison v. Redd 635 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
The test for determining whether an exception of no cause of action should be maintained was reiterated recently in Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., wherein the court stated: The function of an exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.
Brennan v. Shell Offshore, Inc. 635 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
See also Everything On Wheels v. Subaru South, Inc., , 1241 n. 12 (La.