Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Taylor v. Production Services, Inc., 600 So. 2d 63.

21 citing documents.

Arthur Waller v. State of La., Department of Health & Hospitals La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Plaintiffs' counsel also cited Taylor v. Production Services, Inc., (La.
Waller v. State, Department of Health & Hospitals 79 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Plaintiffs’ counsel also cited Taylor v. Production Services, Inc., wherein the Court noted that a one-third contingency fee contract was entered into between the plaintiff and his attorney and found that fee to be reasonable under the circumstances.
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Broussard 834 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Taylor v. Production Serv., Inc.
City of Shreveport v. Chanse Gas Corp. 794 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Inc., Norris v. Goeders, 26,130 (La.App.
Brumfield v. Coastal Cargo Co., Inc. 768 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Also see, Taylor v. Production Services, Inc. of Mississippi
Gray Insurance Co. v. Salvatierra 679 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
attorney fees in this situation, even though the employer did intervene, the court turned to the principles underlying the Moody decision: “Implicit in the Moody v. Arabie holding is the concept that the intervenor who reaps the benefits of the plaintiffs attorney’s efforts, should bear its proportionate part of a reasonable attorney’s fee for those efforts.” Taylor v. Production Services, Inc.
Great West Cas. Co. v. Manning 687 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Taylor v. Production Services, Inc.
Hebert v. Jeffrey 671 So. 2d 904 La. 1996
Taylor v. Production Services, Inc.
Degruise v. Houma Courier Newspaper Corp. 694 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Taylor v. Production Services, Inc. Mississippi
Ruttley v. Steiner 656 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Norris v. Goeders 652 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
The apportionment of attorney fees was clarified further in Taylor v. Production Services, Inc.
Rabito v. Otis Elevator Co. 648 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Taylor v. Production Services, Inc. of Mississippi
Fannin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 647 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
4 Cir.1993); Taylor v. Production Services, Inc., of Mississippi
Rabito v. Otis Elevator Co. 633 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Moody, supra, 498 So.2d at 1087
Cosse v. Allen-Bradley Co. 625 So. 2d 486 La. 1994
In finding the 1989 amendment applicable to this case, the court of appeal relied on *490 footnote one in Taylor v. Production Services, Inc., in which we stated "[t]he 1989 amendment is not applicable to this case in which judgment was rendered prior to the effective date of the statute."
Melton v. General Elec. Co., Inc. 625 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
In Taylor v. Production Services, Inc. of Mississippi, the Supreme Court applied Moody and amended a judgment to require a compensation carrier to pay its share of costs.
Weaver v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 615 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
LRS 23:1103(C); Taylor v. Production Services, Inc.
Broussard v. Lewis 614 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Taylor v. Production Services, Inc. of Mississippi
Darbonne v. Canal Refining Co. 614 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Moody v. Arabie, supra, which was reaffirmed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Taylor v. Production Services, Inc., clearly dictates that the intervenor’s proportionate share be based on plaintiff’s total recovery.
Cosse v. Allen-Bradley Co. 612 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
In the recent case of Taylor v. Production Serv., Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the application of La.R.S.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Smith 609 So. 2d 809 La. 1992
Taylor v. Production Services, Inc. of Mississippi, , 65 n. 1 (La.1992) ("[t]he 1989 amendment is not applicable to this case in which judgment was rendered prior to the effective date of the statute"); Wood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.