Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Albritton v. Albritton, 600 So. 2d 1328.

13 citing documents.

In Re: Marshall Legacy Foundation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
and its holding that the strong public policy in favor of trust indestructibility forbids attempts to amend a trust, particularly when the MMR trust instrument precludes such amendments.
In the Matter of the Succession of Jesse R. Coleman, Sr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
McCaffery v. Lindner 263 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In Re: Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens Living Trust and Eleanor Pierce Stevens Revocable Gift Trust La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
1 Cir. 1993) ( the provision will be “given effect, unless opposed to law or public policy,” In re James C. Atkinson Clifford Trust, 762 So.2d at 776.
In re Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens Living Trust 159 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1 Cir.1993) (), the provision will be “given effect, unless opposed to law or public policy,” In re James C. Atkinson Clifford Trust, 762 So.2d at 776 .
J-W Operating Co. v. Olsen 130 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Ms. Williams did not file her own motion for summary judgment, but she opposed Roos’s. Action of the District Court After the matter was submitted on briefs, the court found that the Noble House assignment violated a rule of public order, that of protecting the settlor’s intent as set forth in the trust document, particularly the spendthrift provisions, and the sale of the corpus would divest the beneficiary of his interest.
Cockerham v. Cockerham 201 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Succession of Gourgis 1 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Fertel v. Brooks 832 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
We have reviewed the Jerome S. Fertel No. 2 and No. 3 Trusts (the Jerome S. Fertel No. 1 Trust is not in the record before us); both provide that “the Trustee shall be entitled to reasonable compensation and reimbursement of normal expenses.” 9 We have also reviewed the case cited by Mr. Fertel, for the proposition that the contracts in question are absolute nullities because they violate the trust provisions calling for “reasonable compensation.” However, we find Albrit-ton inapplicable to the
Miller v. Miller 817 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
The District Court sustained the objection, citing Albritton v. Albritton, 91-2903 (La.5/26/92), , but allowed Leo to introduce into evidence the 1993 settlement and act of resignation.
In Re Guidry Trust 713 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
(citation omitted): We have held this concept of trust indestructibility is "inherent in our Louisiana trust law."
Albritton v. Albritton 622 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Since the instant appeal was lodged, reversed our decision in the original matter and remanded the case to the trial court.
McInnis v. McInnis 618 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Inherent within this body of law is the concept of trust indestructibility, (La.