STATE, THROUGH DOTD v. Scramuzza
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 31, 1992 594 So. 2d 521
STATE, THROUGH DOTD v. Scramuzza, 594 So. 2d 521 (La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992).
Cited by
- Petranick v. White Consolidated Industries 857 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Eubanks v. Salmon 726 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
- STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Scramuzza 692 So. 2d 1024 La. 1997
- STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Scramuzza 673 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
- State ex rel. Dept. of Transportation & Development v. Scramuzza 594 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- STATE EX REL. DOTD v. Scramuzza 594 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- STATE EX REL. DOTD v. Scramuzza 594 So. 2d 517
Opinion text
594 So.2d 521 (1992) STATE of Louisiana Through the DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION & DEVELOPMENT v. Alfred SCRAMUZZA, et al. No. 91-CA-163. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. January 31, 1992. *522 Ronald J. Bertrand, Rayne, for plaintiff-appellant. Thomas Lee, Harahan, Mack E. Barham, Robert E. Arceneaux, Barham & Markle, PLC, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees. Before FINK, J. Pro Tem., and KLIEBERT and BOWES, JJ. ELORA C. FINK, Judge Pro Tem. For the reason assigned this day in no. 91-CA-162, State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation & Development v. Scramuzza, 594 So.2d 517 consolidated herewith, the appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded. APPEAL DISMISSED, CASE REMANDED.