Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ross v. Highlands Ins. Co., 590 So. 2d 1177.

25 citing documents.

State of La Office of Governor, Div. of Admin. Office of Risk Mgmt, Dotd v. Patrick Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Elizabeth Soileau v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. 2019
Smith v. Orleans Parish School Board 2 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Dianna Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 939 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Veal v. AMERICAN MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR 923 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist. 836 So. 2d 14 La. 2003
Godeaux v. Lewis Chapman Construction Co. 836 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. v. Belt 815 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 12/7/94); -36 , we fisted several axioms considered by the supreme court, in order to determine whether a district court retains jurisdiction over a workers’ compensation matter within the meaning of Act 260: (1) “Proper characterization of the petition, thus, lies at the heart of the matter.” Id.
Weller v. Brown 813 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum 805 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Co., in deciding whether the OWC or the district court had jurisdiction over an action to enforce a judgment, the court observed: The term "claim" is nowhere defined in the Worker's Compensation Act.
Harvey v. BE&K CONST. CO. 772 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Co., in deciding whether the OWC or the district court had jurisdiction over an action to enforce a judgment, the court observed: The term "claim" is nowhere defined in the Worker's Compensation Act.
Western Southern v. Lafleur 746 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Gray v. Hospital Services of Louisiana, Inc. 715 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
3 Cir. 12/7/94); -86 , the court listed several axioms considered by the supreme court, to determine whether a district court retains jurisdiction over a workers’ compensation matter within the meaning of Act 260: (1) “Proper characterization of the petition, thus, lies at the heart of the matter.” Id.
Insurance Co. of North America v. Shell 704 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
INA argued that a petition filed after January 1, 1990, seeking modification of a district court judgment, had to be heard by the OWC.
Wilson v. La. Safety Ass'n of Timberman 690 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Co., (A "claim" under the Act is the underlying claim for relief); Rock v. City of New Orleans, 94-2613 (La.App.
Geason v. Harmony Const. 665 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Co., the Supreme Court implied that La.R.S.
Rock v. City of New Orleans 661 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
the hearing officer granted the exception and dismissed appellant's claim.
Schoemann v. Schoemann 654 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
CNA Ins. Co. v. Tibbitts 647 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Co., interpreted the language of Act 260 and assigned meaning to the words "claim" and "resolved."
Griffin v. Container Carrier Corp. 641 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Dietz v. Guichard Drilling Co. 626 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Young 619 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
“(C) However, claims filed with the director prior to January 1, 1990, but which are not resolved, whether by the parties’ acceptance of the director’s recommendations, compromise settlement, or judgment of a court, shall be resolved by the procedures in effect prior to January 1, 1990.” the court concluded that an action to enforce a worker’s compensation judgment filed on April 16, 1989, did not qualify as a “claim” as that term is intended under the Worker’s Compensation Act and, more specifi
Chaisson v. Risk Management 618 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Co., wherein the Supreme Court had to determine whether the 1988 amendments to the Act divested the district court of its subject matter jurisdiction over a petition to enforce an earlier judgment and an earlier order from the district court judge ordering the defendants to pay for medical treatment.
Key v. Insurance Co. of North America 605 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Co., Devlin, Worker's Compensation and the District Courts: a Jurisdictional Limit on Administrative Adjudication, 51 La.L.Rev.