Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Martin, 595 So. 2d 592.
-
State of Louisiana v. Isaac Thomas Gee
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
denied, 566 U.S. 908, 132 S. Ct. 1794, 182 L. Ed. 2d 621 (2012); (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Lonnie B. Kirklin, Jr. A/K/A Lonnie Bernard Kirklin, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 10, (La.1/17/95)
-
State Of Louisiana in the Interest of M.J.
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 120, 97 S. Ct. 2243, 2256, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 ( 1977) ( citing Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 301- 02, 87 S. Ct. 1967, 1972, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ( 1967)); ( La.
- State of Louisiana v. Roland Butler La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
-
State v. Turner
267 So. 3d 1202
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
P. art. 703(D) ; State v. Martin , (La.
-
State v. Doucette
243 So. 3d 704
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Martin , , 595 (La.1992).
-
State v. Johnson
182 So. 3d 1039
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
1794 , 182 L.Ed.2d 621 (2012); (La.App.
-
State v. Long
154 So. 3d 799
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Stokes, 36,212 (La.App.2d Cir.9/18/02), , writ denied, 02-2807 (La.9/05/03), .
- State v. Parker 141 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
- State v. Williams 137 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Moore 134 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
-
State v. Parker
124 So. 3d 516
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Brooks, 92-3331 (La.1/17/95), ; 3 State v. Young, 39,546 (La.App.2d Cir.3/2/05), .
- State v. Quinn 123 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State v. Ruano 120 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State v. Bentley 116 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-
State of Louisiana v. Brent Authorlee
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2243, 2254, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
-
State v. Authorlee
111 So. 3d 1170
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2243, 2254 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
- State v. Lewis 110 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
-
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan L.citizen
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2243, 2254, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
-
State v. Bradley
99 So. 3d 1099
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Manson, supra; Higgins, 03-1980 at 19-20, 898 So.2d at 1233
- State v. Atkins 74 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
- State v. Atkins 74 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
- State v. Williams 66 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
State v. Sparks
68 So. 3d 435
La. 2011
967, 970-971 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968)
-
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lee Guillory
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
967, 970-71, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968).”
-
State v. Guillory
61 So. 3d 801
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
967, 970-71 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968).”
-
State of Louisiana v. Fred Ballard
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2243, 2254, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
-
State v. Horn
55 So. 3d 100
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Green, supra; State v. Brooks, 92-3331 (La.1/17/95), , |21S tate v. Young, 39,546 (La.App.2d Cir.3/2/05), .
- State v. Moody 38 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- State v. Jones 33 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
State v. Laster
33 So. 3d 259
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Clark, 44,594 (La.App.2d Cir.08/19/09), .
- State v. Clark 16 So. 3d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
-
State, in Interest of Kmt
18 So. 3d 183
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
“Against these factors is to be weighed the corrupting effect of the suggestive identification itself.” Id.
-
State v. Cooper
2 So. 3d 1172
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
2d Cir.3/2/05), , citing State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Brooks, 92-3331 (La.1/17/95)
- State Ex Rel. Jn 984 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- State ex rel. J.N. 984 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
-
State ex rel. A.M.
983 So. 2d 176
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Holmes, 931 So.2d at 1161 ().
-
State Ex Rel. Am
983 So. 2d 176
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Holmes, 931 So.2d at 1161 ().
- State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
-
State v. Smith
960 So. 2d 369
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Young, 39,546 (La.App.2d Cir.03/02/05), , citing State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95), ; State v. Brooks, 92-3331 (La.01/17/95), , (La.
- State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
- State v. Holmes 931 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Danny Ray Sherman
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
“when reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, we will consider the entire record, including the testimony presented at trial.
-
State v. Sherman
896 So. 2d 1194
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
"when reviewing a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress, we will consider the entire record, including the testimony presented at trial.
-
State v. Hopkins
897 So. 2d 854
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
He concludes that the circumstances of the instant identification are comparable to those warranting a
-
State v. Young
895 So. 2d 753
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 10, (La.1/17/95)
-
State v. Payne
892 So. 2d 51
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Manson v. Brathwaite, supra; State v. Winfrey, 97-427 (La.App.
-
State v. Sherman
886 So. 2d 1116
La. 2004
State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Brooks, 92-3331, p. 10, (La.1/17/95)
-
State v. Bartley
871 So. 2d 563
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Manson v. Brathwaite, supra
-
State v. Lee
868 So. 2d 256
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
2243, 2254 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)