Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brewington, 601 So. 2d 656.

105 citing documents.

State v. Powell 804 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
The Louisiana Supreme Court has long approved of the introduction of other crimes evidence, “when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it,” or “to complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.”
State v. Evans 801 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 6/18/97) , , writ denied, 97-1953 (La.1/9/98)
State ex rel. Brewington v. State 791 So. 2d 646 La. 2001
3rd Cir.1991), reversed, appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Williams 779 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Malvoisin 779 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Guillory 773 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Explaining the res gestae exception, the Louisiana Supreme Court, stated: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State v. Walker 775 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
stating: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State v. Schmidt 771 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
stating: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State v. Snavely 759 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State v. Powell 746 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 6/18/97) , , writ denied, 97-1953 (La.1/9/98)
State v. Hamilton 747 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Donald 745 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
The Louisiana Supreme Court specifically approved the admission of other crimes evidence “when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not |shave accurately presented its case without reference to it.” State v. Coates, supra, at 578 , citing, (per curiam).
State v. Colomb 747 So. 2d 1074 La. 1999
State v. Burton 746 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 6/18/97) , , writ denied, 97-1953 (La.1/9/98)
State v. Curtis 739 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State v. Arrington 738 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hopson 735 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
The Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of "other crimes evidence" -657 (La.1992), stating in part, that: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State v. Davis 735 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
The Louisiana Supreme Court, (La.
State v. Johnson 728 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Reyes 726 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Colomb 720 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
the supreme court states: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State v. Wafer 719 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
the supreme court stated: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State v. August 719 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Francis 709 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
(per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated its approval of the admission of other crimes evidence, under this portion of La.Code Evid.
State v. Hopson 703 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Parker 696 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Garner 694 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
informs that other crimes evidence is admissible, when the purpose for its admission is not to depict the defendant as a bad person, but rather to complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.
State v. Wesley 685 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Clark 687 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
the Supreme Court stated: This court has approved the admission of other crimes evidence when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it.
State v. Davis 685 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
used to admit into evidence an autopsy photograph of Ms. Brown’s fetus because “the Rintroduction of the photograph would only serve to inflame the jury....” Where the evidence in question constitutes an integral part of the act, the purpose of its admission is “to complete the story of the crime on trial by proving its immediate context of happenings near in time and place.”
State v. Spencer 683 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Also, this evidence may be considered admissible because it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the State could not have accurately presented its case without referring to it, or the defendant could not have presented his defense without referring to it.
State v. Smith 681 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
(per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated its approval of the admission of other crimes evidence (under this portion of article 404(B)(1)) "when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the State could not have accurately presented its case without reference to
State v. Wilson 677 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Allen 663 So. 2d 686 La. 1995
(aborted conspiracy to burn one of defendant's homes and conspiracy to burn another of his homes consummated several months later "were integral parts of a single transaction").
State v. Bailey 664 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Coates 661 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Bordenave 660 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Williams 658 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Pratt 653 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Smith 649 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Nedd 647 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
(per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated its approval of the admission of other crimes evidence (under this portion of article 404B(1)) "when it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference to it
State v. Moore 642 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
also see Westerfield and Harges' Louisiana Evidence (2d ed. 1992) sec.
State v. Lee 637 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Diaz 635 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Also, this evidence may be considered admissible because it is related and intertwined with the charged offense to such an extent that the State could not have accurately presented its case without referring to it, or the defendant could not have presented his defense without referring to it.
State v. Dabney 633 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Pettibone 626 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Evins 626 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Roblow 623 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
(per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated its approval of the admission of other crimes evidence, under this portion of article 404(B)(1), "when it is related and intertwined *57 with the charged offense to such an extent that the state could not have accurately presented its case without reference