Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lobato, 603 So. 2d 739.

909 citing documents.

  • State v. Mance 797 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Young 786 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Points 787 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. McNeal 785 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Brauner 782 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Carter 782 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Spencer 808 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Dorthey, 623 So.2d at 1280-1281 , the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that if a trial judge determines that the punishment mandated by the Habitual Offender Law makes no “measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment” or that the sentence amounts to nothing more than “the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering” and
  • State v. Rodriguez 781 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    "`A sentence is grossly disproportionate if, when the crime and punishment are considered in light of the harm done to society, it shocks the sense of justice.'" Baxley , 94-2982 at p. 9, 656 So.2d at 979 (); State v. Hills, 98-0507, p. 5 (La.App.
  • State v. Derouin 778 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Lefeure 778 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Carter 779 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Briscoe 779 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Durant 776 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lapell 777 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Richmond, 98-1015 (La.App.
  • State v. Payne 777 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Robinson 772 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. McBride 776 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    5/31/96), , I am of the opinion that the trial court should be affirmed.
  • State v. Crowell 773 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Carter 773 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Pleasant 772 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Clark 774 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Walker 775 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Interest of WTB 771 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: The conspiracy is presumed to continue unless or until the defendant shows his withdrawal from or termination of the conspiracy.
  • State v. Wilkinson 772 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Short 769 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Sanders 769 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Breaux 767 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lucas 767 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Cepriano 767 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Tribbit 767 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Walker 773 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Smith 766 So. 2d 501 La. 2000
    Baxley, 656 So.2d at 979 , ().
  • State v. Perkins 762 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Henderson 762 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    [4] In Dorthey, 623 So.2d at 1280-81 , the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that if a trial judge determines that the punishment mandated by the Habitual Offender Law makes no "measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment" or that the sentence amounts to nothing more than "the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering" and
  • State v. Averette 764 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. McDonald 766 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Anderson 764 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hunter 765 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Debrow 763 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hayden 767 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Walker 764 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Milton 764 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    85 , 139 L.Ed.2d 42 (1997)
  • State v. Ross 760 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Richmond, 98-1015 (La.App.
  • State v. Dupart 769 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Gibson 761 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Bazile 762 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Isenogle 761 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Daigle, 96-782, p. 2 (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 760 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Sam 761 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000