Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lobato, 603 So. 2d 739.

909 citing documents.

State v. Williams 729 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Moreau 726 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Freeman 727 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Tritt v. Gares 735 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Sanders 728 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Burns 723 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Spradley 722 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Lewis 720 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Guidroz 721 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Armant 719 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5th Cir. 1/28/97); ; appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
once the state established the conspiracy, the burden shifted to the defense to prove the conspiracy had terminated before the statement was made.
State v. Richards 713 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Francis 715 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Davis 711 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Marshall, 94-0461, (La.9/5/95), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95)
State v. Treadway 710 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Tran 709 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Johnson 709 So. 2d 672 La. 1998
State v. Johnson 709 So. 2d 679 La. 1998
State v. Park 707 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Ernest 710 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Batiste 708 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Maschek 705 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Maschek 706 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Delaughter 703 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Marshall, 94-0461, (La.9/5/95), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95)
State v. Taylor 702 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Marshall, 94-0461, (La.9/5/95), ; State v. Baxley, 94—2982 (La.5/22/95)
State v. Hubb 700 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
5 Cir. 1/28/97) ; ; appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Porter 700 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Marshall, 94-0461, (La.9/5/95), ; State v. Baxley, 94-2982 (La.5/22/95)
State v. Lemon 698 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
2d Cir.1991), conditionally affirmed and remanded, appeal after remand, (La.App.
State v. Moore 696 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Additionally, the supreme court noted that the penalty for conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute was a sentencing range from zero to five years with a maximum fine of $2,500 at the time of the offense.
State v. Anderson 697 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Pendelton 696 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Keys 694 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Johnson 693 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
preme Court responded to the legislature’s grant of discretion to district attorneys to file multiple offender bills leading to severe mandatory minimum sentences for felony recidivists by granting trial judges the discretion to deviate from mandatory minimum sentences but neglected to give any greater guidance in the exercise of that discretion than a (La.App.
State v. Jackson 694 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Lofton 691 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Daigle 688 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Hebert 688 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Lewis 688 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
on subsequent appeal, (La.App.
State v. Stepp 686 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Lavalais 685 So. 2d 1048 La. 1996
State v. Ledet 694 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Compton 683 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
preme Court responded to the legislature's grant of discretion to district attorneys to file multiple offender bills leading to severe mandatory minimum sentences for felony recidivists by granting trial judges the discretion to deviate from mandatory minimum sentences but neglected to give any greater guidance in the exercise of that discretion than a (La.App.
State v. McAlister 681 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Milstead 681 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Smith, 93-0402 (La.7/5/94), ; State v. Williams, 93-1422 (La.
State v. Winnon 681 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Kimble 688 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Const. Art. I, § 20; (La.
State v. Singleton 680 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
on subsequent appeal, (La.App.
State v. Harris 679 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. McCray 679 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Allen 677 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996