Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fluker, 618 So. 2d 459.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Damond Scott La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State ex rel. W.V. 246 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In State v.Fluker, ,462 (La.App.
State v. Trung Le 243 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Fluker , , 463 (La.App.
State v. Barron 243 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
4/8/11), ; State v. Fluker , (La.
State v. Abbott 222 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
ana Supreme Court held that "In reviewing a conviction in which the defendant offered evidence tending to establish the affirmative defense of justification, an appellate court must determine whether a rational trier of fact could have concluded by a preponderance of the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, that defendant’s [conduct was justified].” (La.
State ex rel. M.J. 160 So. 3d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Rouser 158 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Canales 156 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 12/14/11), , writ denied, 12-0112 (La.5/18/12), ( (La.App.
State v. Cooks 81 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Boudreaux 48 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Black 41 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 9/11/02), , this court addressed the doctrine of self-defense: (La.App.
State v. Terrell 9 So. 3d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Jefferson 922 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Hall 889 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
5 Cir.1986) that the defendant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that his actions were in self-defense or in defense of others in a non-homicide case, (La.App.
State v. Wischer 885 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
State v. Woods 828 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Smith 777 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Varnado 753 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Jackson 733 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
[3] Although the Fifth Circuit also found "that the defendant failed to meet her burden of proof as to the defense of compulsion," Barnes at 407 , this court has held, (La.App.
State v. Rainey 722 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
We recognize that the Fourth Circuit, (La.App.
State v. Davis 633 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994