State Ex Rel. Davis v. Waldron
Also decided on this docket: La., October 9, 1992 605 So. 2d 1109
State Ex Rel. Davis v. Waldron, 605 So. 2d 1109 (La. 1992).
Cited by
- State ex rel. Holmes v. Criminal District Court, Section G 629 So. 2d 1165 La. 1993
- State ex rel. Woods v. Reed 629 So. 2d 1156 La. 1993
- State ex rel. Batiste v. Whitley 629 So. 2d 1157 La. 1993
- State ex rel. McCormick v. Rader 629 So. 2d 1143 La. 1993
- State ex rel. Washington v. Whitley 629 So. 2d 1144 La. 1993
- State v. Stewart 629 So. 2d 1144 La. 1993
- Voelker v. Miller 613 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
- State v. Woods 609 So. 2d 247 La. 1992
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Bruins 407 So. 2d 685
- State v. Lucas 598 So. 2d 338
Opinion text
605 So.2d 1109 (1992) STATE ex rel. Billy DAVIS v. Hon. Dennis J. WALDRON, Judge. No. 91-KH-1996. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 9, 1992. Granted in part; denied in part. This case is remanded to the district court for correction of relator's sentence of 33 years at hard labor, the mandatory minimum penalty that any court could impose on a multiple offender convicted of armed robbery and sentenced under La.R.S. 15:529.1, to reflect that the sentence will run without benefit of parole. State v. Bruins, 407 So.2d 685 (La.1981). The requirement of law that relator serve his sentence without parole eligibility represents a "`wholly logical, non-vindictive reason ...,'" for correcting the sentence in this case. State v. Lucas, 598 So.2d 338 (La.1992) [quoting Texas v. McCullough, 475 U.S. 134, 140 , 106 S.Ct. 976, 980 , 89 L.Ed.2d 104 (1986)]." In all other respects the application is denied.